2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.06.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Difficulties in distinguishing between an atlas fracture and a congenital posterior atlas arch defect in postmortem analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This fracture can occur, but in all the cases reviewed it is accompanied by at least one other fracture generally at the anterior sagittal midline [ 45 ], a combination included in some of the aforementioned classification systems [ 44 ]. Furthermore, as indicated above, radiography and observations through binocular lens and ESEM show two features: First, a clear smooth continuity of the cortex along the tip of the lamina of SD-1643, without exposure of the inner trabeculae, thus excluding peri- and post-mortem fractures; second, absence of osteogenic reaction thus excluding a healed but unfused ante-mortem fracture [ 46 ] ( Fig 1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This fracture can occur, but in all the cases reviewed it is accompanied by at least one other fracture generally at the anterior sagittal midline [ 45 ], a combination included in some of the aforementioned classification systems [ 44 ]. Furthermore, as indicated above, radiography and observations through binocular lens and ESEM show two features: First, a clear smooth continuity of the cortex along the tip of the lamina of SD-1643, without exposure of the inner trabeculae, thus excluding peri- and post-mortem fractures; second, absence of osteogenic reaction thus excluding a healed but unfused ante-mortem fracture [ 46 ] ( Fig 1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to SD-1094, fractures at the anterior sagittal midline have been described [ 45 ], but the augmented images again indicate a smooth continuity of the bony cortex from the ventral and dorsal surface of the anterior arch to the sagittal midplane ( Fig 2 ). This continuity is only interrupted due to post-mortem erosion with exposed trabeculae in the central part of the midplane, and absence of osteogenic response compatible with a healed but unfused ante-mortem fracture is observed also for SD-1094 [ 46 ]( Fig 2 ). These observations exclude ante-, peri- or post-mortem fractures as possible explanations for the presence of the sagittal midplane truncation of the anterior arch of the atlas of SD-1094.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1999) were used to rule out the presence of any fractures that could superficially mimic an anatomical variant (Sanchis‐Gimeno et al . 2014). When cortical bone was present in the region under study with no signs of osteogenic reaction, a fracture had to be ruled out, and the presence of an anatomical variant was suspected (Sanchis‐Gimeno et al .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When cortical bone was present in the region under study with no signs of osteogenic reaction, a fracture had to be ruled out, and the presence of an anatomical variant was suspected (Sanchis‐Gimeno et al . 2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation