Difficulties in differentiating thin basement membrane disease from Alport syndrome

Żurawski, Jakub; Burchardt, Paweł; Seget, Monika; Moczko, Jerzy; Woźniak, Aldona; Grochowalski, Marcin; Salwa-Zurawska, W

doi:10.5114/pjp.2016.65869

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“… 15 Incomplete features or only GBM thinning may be observed in females and earlier stages of the disease. 23 In our study, 18.8% and 37.5% of the patients showed suspicious features of AS and diffuse GBM thinning. The distinction between TBMN and AS is an interesting and challenging issue in this situation.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 51%

Clinicopathological Features of Hereditary Nephritis in the Iranian Population: Analysis of a 14-Year Survey in Kidney Biopsies From a Large Referral Center

Emami,

Nili,

Sotoudeh Anvari

et al. 2024

Arch Iran Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Hereditary nephritis (HN), including Alport syndrome (AS) and thin basement membrane nephropathy (TBMN), is a rare genetic cause of hematuria. A definitive diagnosis requires electron microscopy (EM). Therefore, the clinical characteristics of these conditions are less known. This study aimed to determine the percentage and clinicopathological features of HN in patients from a referral center in Iran. Methods: We checked kidney biopsy reports from 2007 to 2021 and extracted cases with HN. Fresh specimens of the cases diagnosed in the last two years were stained by immunofluorescence (IF) for collagen type IV alpha chains. EM findings in these cases were re-evaluated and categorized as diffuse glomerular basement membrane (GBM) thinning, definite, and suspicious features of AS. Results: We analyzed 3884 pathology reports of kidney biopsies from 2007 to 2021 and identified 210 patients (5.4%) with HN, with a mean age of 13.78±12.42 years old. Hematuria with proteinuria (53.3%), isolated hematuria (44.2%), and proteinuria with hematuria and increased creatinine (2.5%) were found in these patients. The re-evaluation of EM findings revealed GBM thinning, definite, and suspicious findings of AS in 37.5%, 43.8%, and 18.8% cases, respectively. The most common diagnosis in 32 cases after the IF study was X-linked AS (71.9%), and 6.2% of cases were autosomal recessive AS. TBMN and autosomal dominant AS remained the differential diagnoses in 21.9%. Conclusion: It was found that EM is helpful for the primary diagnosis of patients with definite AS. Immunostaining improves the diagnostic sensitivity for the differentiation of those with suspicious EM findings and determines the inheritance pattern. However, a multidisciplinary approach for a subset of cases is required for the best diagnosis and management.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 51%