Difficult Removal of External Jugular Vein Catheters

Bj, McKenzie; Ip, Latto

doi:10.1177/0310057x8100900212

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Discussion2

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

1985

2013

Publication Types

Select...

Article5

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent5

Authors

Journals

Cited by 5 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 6 publications

(2 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…At lower segments of the EJV, the AJV, TCV, and SSV drain to the EJV at the entrance to SCV, the EJV runs in a lateral direction, potentially leading to the arm rather than the thorax. In approximately 4% of the population, there is a plexus of veins under the clavicle [17]. Variations of these veins at the terminal point and angulation of the EJV to the SCV contribute to the insertion failure rate [10].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Central Venous Access via External Jugular Vein with CT-Venography Using a Multidetector Helical 16-Section CT

Katô¹,

Taniguchi

Iwasaki

et al. 2013

Journal of Investigative Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Central Venous Access via External Jugular Vein with CT-Venography Using a Multidetector Helical 16-Section CT

Katô¹,

Taniguchi

Iwasaki

et al. 2013

Journal of Investigative Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The cannula was then removed from the vein and the patient was returned to the horizontal position. No force was used to advance the catheter as this can result in kinking and difficulty in removal (McKenzie and Latto, 1981). The position of the catheter tip was confirmed by x-ray after surgery.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison Between Pressures Measured From the Proximal External Jugular Vein and a Central Vein

Shah

Swai

Latto

1986

British Journal of Anaesthesia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Mean venous pressures were measured in 20 patients in whom a catheter, inserted via the external jugular vein, failed to pass centrally. The catheter used had a rounded end and two side holes. Pressures were measured with the patient's head in three different positions. The pressures were compared with the central venous pressures measured from a catheter inserted through an antecubital vein (and confirmed to be placed centrally). In all patients the differences between the mean pressures from the two sites were all within 3 mm Hg and were not influenced by alteration in head position or the side of jugular catheterization.

show abstract

A complication of subclavian vein catheterisation. Extravascular knotting of a guidewire

Wang¹,

Einarsson²

1987

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Difficult Removal of External Jugular Vein Catheters

Abstract: Two cases of difficult removal of external jugular vein catheters and their probable cause are discussed.

Cited by 5 publications

References 6 publications

Central Venous Access via External Jugular Vein with CT-Venography Using a Multidetector Helical 16-Section CT

Central Venous Access via External Jugular Vein with CT-Venography Using a Multidetector Helical 16-Section CT

Comparison Between Pressures Measured From the Proximal External Jugular Vein and a Central Vein

A complication of subclavian vein catheterisation. Extravascular knotting of a guidewire

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About