2002
DOI: 10.1097/00000539-200201000-00045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Difficult Endotracheal Intubation as a Result of Penetrating Cranio-Facial Injury by an Arrow

Abstract: We report a case of a 42-yr-old patient who underwent surgery for a penetrating craniofacial injury caused by an arrow. Because of the median vertical trajectory of the arrow (from the chin to the frontal skull), only the right nasal approach was accessible for endotracheal intubation. Fiberoptic nasal intubation and securing the airway under local anesthesia are described.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A rapidly expanding hematoma causing airway obstruction must also be considered [6]. Even though awake fiberoptic intubation is the standard for traumatic airway injury and has been successfully performed in other instances of penetrating facial injury [5], it was unsuccessful in this case because the patient had active hemorrhage from an arterial transection that significantly obscured visualization of the airway anatomy. Furthermore, the patient was intoxicated and uncooperative with the fiberoptic intubation and every attempt with the bronchoscope only worsened his agitation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A rapidly expanding hematoma causing airway obstruction must also be considered [6]. Even though awake fiberoptic intubation is the standard for traumatic airway injury and has been successfully performed in other instances of penetrating facial injury [5], it was unsuccessful in this case because the patient had active hemorrhage from an arterial transection that significantly obscured visualization of the airway anatomy. Furthermore, the patient was intoxicated and uncooperative with the fiberoptic intubation and every attempt with the bronchoscope only worsened his agitation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, there is no current consensus amongst the anesthesia community on airway management of penetrating maxillofacial injuries and much variability exists [2][3][4][5]. Here, we present a case of an impaled foreign body to the face and our approach to airway management of this patient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…As most victims show some survival time after the injury, it is possible that the arrow may be removed by the victim themselves8 . Despite their low kinetic energy (compared with projectiles from guns), crossbow arrows have a high penetration force, and may be sufficient to enable penetration of the skull at short range, as in the current case20 . The cutting edge of the arrow is extremely sharp, facilitating penetration of tissue4 .There are no significant pathological differences among suicidal, homicidal, and accidental fatal crossbow injuries in the literature.…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Examples included transfixion through the floor of the mouth with a bamboo cane [17], penetration of the mouth floor with a nail [18], a spear gun shaft penetrating the floor of the mouth [19] and a crossbow arrow entering under the chin and passing through the tongue, nasal cavity and between the frontal lobes [20]. Methods of management included awake fibreoptic intubation (AFOI) [17][18][19][20] rapid sequence induction of anaesthesia (RSI) [22,23] and surgical tracheostomy following failure of AFOI [19].…”
Section: Penetrating Injury Though the Mouthmentioning
confidence: 99%