2020
DOI: 10.1080/02615479.2020.1717461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differing knowledges: comparing the contribution of drama students and service users in role-plays preparing social work students for practice

Abstract: Bunting, L. (2020). Differing Knowledges: Comparing the contribution of drama students and service users in role plays preparing social work students for practice. Social Work Education.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Strategies for SUC involvement included role plays (e.g. Duffy et al, 2021); interviews (Smith, 2011); one-to-one conversations (Cabiati and Raineri, 2016); small group discussion (e.g. Quinney and Fowler, 2013); involvement in learning groups (e.g.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Strategies for SUC involvement included role plays (e.g. Duffy et al, 2021); interviews (Smith, 2011); one-to-one conversations (Cabiati and Raineri, 2016); small group discussion (e.g. Quinney and Fowler, 2013); involvement in learning groups (e.g.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students felt they had a better understanding of the link between the concept of empowerment and the practices of empowerment, their relational competence had developed and they learnt to be more open and inclusive (Askheim, 2012). Additional learning outcomes reported by students included the importance of listening (Hitchin, 2016); increased confidence in interacting with service users (Duffy et al, 2021); improved communication (Skilton, 2011) and questioning skills (Lucas and Thomas, 2021).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a central feature of this module has been the involvement of teaching partners who are service users, carers, drama students/ actors. The input from these partners is considered a core element of teaching, and the relative merits of each partner has been evaluated (Duffy et al, 2021). Co-produced teaching is seen to concur with the policy trajectory in the UK, where service users and carers are expected to have a significant role in informing policy and practice developments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inclusion and exclusion criteria were challenging because of the undefined terminology and broad understanding for this area of social work education for example most of the studies reviewed required student social workers to take on a role and 'act out' scenarios or situations as part of the learning, therefore they were included. There were also hybrid models and approaches identified and included among them drama and social work students in the study from Duffy et al, (2021). The review excluded applied drama methods and health as it is already extensively used over many decades in allied health education 'Drama has been incorporated in various medical education modules, due to its ability to actively engage its audience' (Reeves et al, 2022, p.362).…”
Section: Criteria For Inclusion and Exclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was not an unanticipated finding given the participatory nature of this type of learning, but it reinforces the continued need for students to experience learning in both the classroom environment as well as in the practice field or placement setting. Dewey (1913) contends that the best way of learning is by 'doing' blending movement, thinking and emotion in learning (Askeland, 2003, p.364). Reflective practice is a wellestablished core element for social work education and practice (Watts, 2019;Ferguson, 2018).…”
Section: Experiential Learning and Reflectionmentioning
confidence: 99%