Differing ecological responses of seabirds to invasive species eradication

Abstract

The impact of invasive species at seabird breeding islands causes a breakdown of important ecological functions such as prey consumption and nutrient transfer, and elevates extinction risk in impacted taxa. Eradicating invasive species from islands can result in substantial short-term recovery of seabird populations and consequently the prevalence of eradication programs as conservation tools is increasing. However, as the scale and complexity of eradications has increased, quantitative data on rates of recovery, especially from larger islands, remain limited. Furthermore, the mechanisms that govern recovery are poorly understood, limiting our ability to forecast outcomes and therefore prioritise effectively. Here, using the world's largest multi-species vertebrate eradication from Macquarie Island as a case study, we show how responses to invasive species and their eradication differ. Species with broad realised niches whose breeding phenology minimizes time on land and corresponds with summer resource abundance remained extant alongside invasive species while more habitat-specific species present in winter were extirpated. Following eradication, immigration and flexibility to colonise under-utilised optimal habitat appears to be boosting population growth in recolonising species, whereas established populations appear to be tethered to refugial habitats by the influence of philopatry, and their recovery is slower as a result. Unpicking these differential responses and the mechanisms behind them provides valuable information to help predict responses in other systems as future eradications are planned.