Abstract:Pediatric and obstetric specialists differ considerably regarding pediatric specialists' role in prenatal care for maternal conditions, and regarding whether to seek judicial intervention for maternal refusal of recommended treatment.
“…We further demonstrated different attitudes between these providers regarding management of several common maternal complications of pregnancy, and regarding the appropriateness of seeking court interventions for maternal refusal of recommended prenatal interventions in three specified clinical scenarios 13. These provider differences may have related to their experiences specific to these conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This study's limitations have been described previously 12 13. Some are inherent to survey research in which non-response and selection biases may influence outcomes, and in which physician behaviour is measured indirectly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study's methods have been previously described in detail 12 13. From November 2009 to February 2010 we mailed confidential, self-administered questionnaires, up to three times, to FCP and MFM specialists in 21 states.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some paediatrics hospitals house internal units for delivery and perinatal maternal care. Our previous work demonstrated that obstetric and paediatric specialists who practice prenatal care have differing attitudes regarding numerous aspects of pregnancy management when certain fetal and maternal conditions are diagnosed 12 13. It is unclear whether such differences represent divergent understandings of how certain fetal and maternal conditions behave clinically, or whether these differences may be associated with distinct, professionally-associated convictions about the ethical appropriateness of alternate management options for such conditions.…”
Independent of demographic and sociopolitical characteristics, FCPs and MFMs possess divergent ethical sensitivities regarding pregnancy termination, pregnant women and fetuses, which may influence clinical care.
“…We further demonstrated different attitudes between these providers regarding management of several common maternal complications of pregnancy, and regarding the appropriateness of seeking court interventions for maternal refusal of recommended prenatal interventions in three specified clinical scenarios 13. These provider differences may have related to their experiences specific to these conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This study's limitations have been described previously 12 13. Some are inherent to survey research in which non-response and selection biases may influence outcomes, and in which physician behaviour is measured indirectly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study's methods have been previously described in detail 12 13. From November 2009 to February 2010 we mailed confidential, self-administered questionnaires, up to three times, to FCP and MFM specialists in 21 states.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some paediatrics hospitals house internal units for delivery and perinatal maternal care. Our previous work demonstrated that obstetric and paediatric specialists who practice prenatal care have differing attitudes regarding numerous aspects of pregnancy management when certain fetal and maternal conditions are diagnosed 12 13. It is unclear whether such differences represent divergent understandings of how certain fetal and maternal conditions behave clinically, or whether these differences may be associated with distinct, professionally-associated convictions about the ethical appropriateness of alternate management options for such conditions.…”
Independent of demographic and sociopolitical characteristics, FCPs and MFMs possess divergent ethical sensitivities regarding pregnancy termination, pregnant women and fetuses, which may influence clinical care.
“…They also note that specialists working in the fetal center are often employed by the same children's hospitals where infants born with complex anomalies would be treated at great expense; this might create the potential for subtle conflicts of interest [1]. An additional concern may be that clinicians from different subspecialties may balance maternal and fetal interests dissimilarly due to differences in their training or professional obligations [2,8,9]. This issue could be especially significant when fetal surgical interventions are being considered.…”
OBJECTIVE: Fetal care centers have recently emerged in affiliation with children's hospitals throughout the United States. Few studies have evaluated this new multidisciplinary model of care.
STUDY DESIGN:We conducted a survey of multidisciplinary fetal care centers in the United States; survey data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: 59 centers were identified; 29 centers (49%) returned completed surveys. Most centers are located in a children's hospital (54%), and the majority of centers (76%) opened in the past 10 years. The majority of centers (62%) are administered by a specialist in Maternal Fetal Medicine or Obstetrics and Gynecology. A specialist in MFM or Ob/Gyn evaluates every patient at 90% of centers; a neonatologist evaluates every patient at 52% of centers. All responding centers have the capability to perform ultrasounds although fewer centers perform fetoscopic surgery (38%) or open fetal surgery (31%). Many centers (41%) conduct research protocols in fetal medicine. Most centers (61%) considered the provision of information to families as their most important goal. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to describe multidisciplinary fetal centers in the United States. It demonstrates variability between centers. More research is needed in order to evaluate the impact of this variability.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.