Differenzierung, Normalisierung, Andersheit 2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-531-92233-1_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differenzierung, Normalisierung, Andersheit. Soziale Arbeit als Arbeit mit den Anderen – eine Einleitung

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An important finding of this study is the tension between professionals’ aim to support parents with intellectual disabilities and, at the same time, to normalize them by pursuing their independence from services. This highlights the continuing influence of the normalization principle in Austrian social work practice and reinforces what Kessl and Plößer (2010: 8, transl. by author) designate as “constitutive dilemma of social work.” According to them, interventions inherently pursue the diminishing of a specific group’s difference from the general population.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An important finding of this study is the tension between professionals’ aim to support parents with intellectual disabilities and, at the same time, to normalize them by pursuing their independence from services. This highlights the continuing influence of the normalization principle in Austrian social work practice and reinforces what Kessl and Plößer (2010: 8, transl. by author) designate as “constitutive dilemma of social work.” According to them, interventions inherently pursue the diminishing of a specific group’s difference from the general population.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Tensions between human rights–based support and individualized normalization strategies of (especially CW) social work have been acknowledged and criticized (e.g., Kessl and Plößer, 2010; Oelkers et al, 2010). Nevertheless, this study shows an imbalance in favor of invasive interventions as opposed to human rights–based services.…”
Section: Conclusion: Potentials Of Deconstruction For Shifts In Meaningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another gendered practice that can be encountered in the dealing of social workers with clients is ‘normalization’. If we base our knowledge on the normalization model, it can be claimed that social work clients are individuals or groups of individuals whose behaviour could be categorized as a deviation from given standards of behaviour (Kessl and Plößer, 2010). In the context of current neoliberal policies and their associated activation programmes, the essential criteria for determining normality and deviation from normality have changed and the same applies to the requirements for the individual.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1.4) werden Prozesse verstanden, mit denen Adressat*innen der Sozialen Arbeit an Normalitätsmuster oder dominante Normalitätsvorstellungen angepasst werden (vgl. Seelmeyer 2008;Kessl/Plößer 2010). Ent-Normalisierung hingegen verweist auf Prozesse und Markierungen, mit denen die Jugendlichen und jungen Erwachsenen bzw.…”
Section: Erfahrungen Der (Ent-)normalisierung Im Kontext Von Stationärer Jugendhilfe Aus Biographischer Perspektiveunclassified