2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00436-010-1982-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differentiation of Myxobolus spp. (Myxozoa: Myxobolidae) infecting roach (Rutilus rutilus) in Hungary

Abstract: During a survey on fishes from Hungarian freshwaters, the occurrence of eight Myxobolus species was registered in roach (Rutilus rutilus L.). Most species had a specific location within the fish host. Of the known species infecting roach, the intramuscularly developing species Myxobolus pseudodispar was found to be the most common. Besides Myxobolus intimus and Myxobolus diversicapsularis infecting the capillary network of gill lamellae, Myxobolus feisti infecting the cartilaginous gill rays were observed. Of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Roach, Rutilus rutilus (L.), and common dace, Leuciscus leuciscus (L.), are two of the most common cyprinid fish in Europe where the myxosporean fauna of these two fishes have been extensively studied (Eiras et al 2005(Eiras et al , 2014Molnár et al 2010). About 24 and 15 Myxobolus species have been respectively reported from roach and common dace in Russia, among which 10 species were recorded from both of these two hosts (Donec and Shulman 1984; Eiras et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Roach, Rutilus rutilus (L.), and common dace, Leuciscus leuciscus (L.), are two of the most common cyprinid fish in Europe where the myxosporean fauna of these two fishes have been extensively studied (Eiras et al 2005(Eiras et al , 2014Molnár et al 2010). About 24 and 15 Myxobolus species have been respectively reported from roach and common dace in Russia, among which 10 species were recorded from both of these two hosts (Donec and Shulman 1984; Eiras et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, a comprehensive strategy including spore morphology, exact location of sporulation, tissue specificity, host specificity, and molecular data was widely thought to be essential for differentiation of the large number of species with morphological similarity. Additionally, some new Myxobolus species with specific habitat have been recently reported in roach in Hungary (Molnár et al 2006(Molnár et al , 2008(Molnár et al , 2010. To further correctly uncover the myxosporean diversity of freshwater fish in Finish Bay by applying the late taxonomic criteria, we performed a myxosporean fauna investigation of three consecutive years (2012)(2013)(2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…have become 'mainstream' in myxozoan research (e.g. Whipps et al 2003, Eszterbauer 2004, Holzer et al 2004, Fiala 2006, Molnár et al 2010, Fiala & Bartošová 2010. Due to the unknown host specificity and geographical distribution of many myxozoan taxa, it is important to provide a combination of morphological and molecular features for a given myxozoan species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accurate identification of these parasites in India is problematic due to the typically poor morphological descriptions and the lack of molecular data. However, recent publications (Molnár et al, 2010;Liu et al, 2012;Székely et al, 2015) suggest that molecular approaches are necessary for correct species identification. In India, molecular tools have barely been applied in studies…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%