2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.04.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differentiation of feline coronavirus type I and II infections by virus neutralization test

Abstract: Feline coronavirus (FCoV) is divided into two types I and II, based on their growth in vitro and antigenicity. In this study, virus neutralization (VN) test was applied for type differentiation of FCoV infections. Sera of cats which were clinically and serologically diagnosed as feline infectious peritonitis (FIP) possessed significantly higher VN titers to type I FCoV, and sera from cats experimentally infected with FIPV type II had high VN titers to type II but not type I viruses. A total of 79 cat sera coll… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
48
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The prevalence of type I and II FCoVs has been surveyed in many countries using serological and molecular assays (Addie et al, 2003;Benetka et al, 2004;Hohdatsu et al, 1992;Kummrow et al, 2005;Shiba et al, 2007;Vennema, 1999). In concordance with others findings, our results indicate that the majority of FCoV infection in Taiwan is due to type I viruses (88.7%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The prevalence of type I and II FCoVs has been surveyed in many countries using serological and molecular assays (Addie et al, 2003;Benetka et al, 2004;Hohdatsu et al, 1992;Kummrow et al, 2005;Shiba et al, 2007;Vennema, 1999). In concordance with others findings, our results indicate that the majority of FCoV infection in Taiwan is due to type I viruses (88.7%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Type II virus is more likely to cause acute infections that result in either FIP or recovery without persistence. This distinction might explain why, in the epidemiological studies from various countries, the prevalence of type II virus is consistently lower than that of type I virus (Addie et al, 2003;Benetka et al, 2004;Hohdatsu et al, 1992;Kummrow et al, 2005;Shiba et al, 2007;Vennema, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…FIPV is serologically classified into types I and II, but both types induce FIP in cats. These 2 types do not serologically cross-react with each other (Pedersen et al, 1984;Shiba et al, 2007). Since type II FIPV more actively replicates in cell lines and is more pathogenic for cats, previous studies on FIPV and anti-FIPV agents were performed using type II FIPV; however, studies have not yet been conducted to search for effective antiviral agents against type I FIPV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The viruses were then added to FCWF-4 cells showing 70% confluency in a 96-well plate, and incubated for 48 h, until the development of cytopathic effect. Neutralising activity was determined by end-point dilution (Shiba et al, 2007).…”
Section: Virus Neutralisation Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%