1992
DOI: 10.1099/0022-1317-73-8-2099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differentiation of cucumber mosaic virus isolates using the polymerase chain reaction

Abstract: A procedure based on the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has been developed to classify cucumber mosaic cucumovirus (CMV) isolates accurately into two subgroups. Two CMV-specific primers that flank the CMV capsid protein gene were used to amplify a DNA fragment of approximately 870 bp. Restriction enzyme analysis of this fragment produces distinct restriction patterns that assign the CMV isolate into one of two subgroups. These two restriction groups correlate with the previously established CMV subgroupings; … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0
7

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(11 reference statements)
1
44
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Serological differentiation, PCR followed by restriction analysis (Rizos et al 1992), and IC-RT-PCR (Yu et al 2005) methods have been used for subgrouping of CMV isolates. The latter method is more applicable because of avoiding the extraction of viral or plant total RNA and can be easily performed in a single tube (Yu et al 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Serological differentiation, PCR followed by restriction analysis (Rizos et al 1992), and IC-RT-PCR (Yu et al 2005) methods have been used for subgrouping of CMV isolates. The latter method is more applicable because of avoiding the extraction of viral or plant total RNA and can be easily performed in a single tube (Yu et al 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The virus is mechanically transmissible by plant sap and spread by more than 80 aphid species in the non-persistent manner. The genome of CMV consists of three singlestranded positive-sense RNA species (Palukaitis & Garcia-Arenal 2003) The CMV strain variation has been studied by serological assay (Wilson & Halliwell 1985), dsRNA analysis , PCR-RFLP (Rizos et al 1992), and microarray methods (Deyong et al 2005); thereby, it has been separated into two main subgroups, subgroup I (S-I) and subgroup II (S-II), on the basis of serological relationships, peptide mapping of the coat protein (CP), nucleic acid hybridisation, and nucleotide sequence identity (Palukaitis et al 1992). Another division of subgroup I into IA and IB has been proposed based on sequence data, analysis of 5'-non-translated region of RNA3 of several strains, and phylogenetic analysis of CP (Roossinck et al 1999;Roossinck 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PCR was done using specific primer pair CMV (CPf/CPr) [5] and a *867 bp expected fragment was amplified from one sample (Pe1). Attempts to detect the ZYMV using a primer pair ZYMV-F(?…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many strains of CMV described from different parts of the world have been put into two subgroups, I and II, based on nucleic acid hybridization (Owen and Palukaitis, 1988), gene sequences (Owen et al, 1990;Szilassy et al, 1999), restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) (Rizos et al, 1992), and serology (Hu et al, 1995). The diverse strains of CMV are divided into two main groups, I and II, according to their genomic sequences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%