2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2016.07.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differentiation of cancer from atrial fibrillation in patients with acute multifocal stroke

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the previous study, hypercoagulability with resistance to anticoagulation therapy in patients with both stroke and active cancer was associated with their poor prognosis ( 11 ). Furthermore, we found that the effect of anticoagulation therapy reduced D-dimer levels during the sub-acute phase in patients with Af alone, whereas D-dimer levels increased during the sub-acute phase and remained elevated despite anticoagulation therapy in TS patients ( 10 ). Thus, serial measurements of D-dimer levels in TS patients may be useful for diagnosing TS patients as well as for evaluating the efficacy of anticoagulant therapy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the previous study, hypercoagulability with resistance to anticoagulation therapy in patients with both stroke and active cancer was associated with their poor prognosis ( 11 ). Furthermore, we found that the effect of anticoagulation therapy reduced D-dimer levels during the sub-acute phase in patients with Af alone, whereas D-dimer levels increased during the sub-acute phase and remained elevated despite anticoagulation therapy in TS patients ( 10 ). Thus, serial measurements of D-dimer levels in TS patients may be useful for diagnosing TS patients as well as for evaluating the efficacy of anticoagulant therapy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…However, various cut-off values of D-dimer levels have been reported for the differential diagnosis of TS patients ( 2 , 7 , 8 ). We recently reported that a D-dimer level ≥2.0 μg/mL was a useful diagnostic marker of TS, compared with patients with atrial fibrillation (Af) alone as a control group based upon Af being the major cause of AMEI ( 10 ). In the previous study, hypercoagulability with resistance to anticoagulation therapy in patients with both stroke and active cancer was associated with their poor prognosis ( 11 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, elevated plasma D-dimer, fibrin degradation product (FDP), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), fibrinogen, and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels are known to be biomarkers of cancer-related stroke [11,12,30]. Based on this finding, Ito et al [31] successfully differentiated cancer-related stroke using elevated plasma D-dimer levels from atrial fibrillation-related acute multifocal embolic stroke, but it was still necessary to determine whether substantiated cancer-related stroke had specific biomarkers. In the present study, KCS patients showed elevated plasma D-dimer, CA125 and CEA levels, and increased urine protein levels, which might be distinct clinical features of KCS patients, or they may be biomarkers of KCS, indicating that elevated plasma CA125 and CEA levels, together with increased proteinuria levels, may also be used to differentiate KCS from other types of cancer-related stroke or other conventional stroke.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A previous study observed fewer vascular risk factors and higher D-dimer levels in cryptogenic stroke patients with active cancer, [ 22 ] and the frequency of microembolic signals on transcranial Doppler images correlated linearly with D-dimer levels in this population. [ 10 ] In 2016, Ito et al [ 14 ] successfully used elevated plasma D-dimer levels to differentiate cancer-related stroke from atrial fibrillation-related acute multifocal embolic stroke, and a recent research identified D-dimer as a predictor of early neurologic deterioration in cryptogenic stroke with active cancer. [ 15 ] The association of D-dimer with hypercoagulability suggests that cancer-specific hypercoagulability is the main mechanism underlying cancer-related ischemic stroke.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This marker was previously found to correlate significantly with disease activity and prognosis in many cases of cancer-related stroke. [ 3 , 4 ] A recent study was the first to distinguished cancer-associated acute multifocal embolic infarction from atrial fibrillation using a D-dimer cut-off level of ≥2.0 μg/mL, [ 14 ] while another study investigated the potential of the D-dimer level as a predictor of early neurologic deterioration in patients with active cancer and recurrent thromboembolic stroke. [ 15 ] The levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, and probrain natriuretic peptide have also been identified as potential biomarkers of cancer-related stroke.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%