2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.nmni.2019.100589
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differentiation of Brucella abortus and B. melitensis biovars using PCR-RFLP and REP-PCR

Abstract: Brucellosis is one of the most common zoonotic diseases of animal and human beings. This study aimed to differentiate the Brucella spp. and determines the patterns of biovars by using repetitive element palindromic (REP)-PCR and PCR restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) methods. A total of 100 blood specimens suspected of harbouring brucellosis were collected. Conventional culture methods and multiplex PCR were used for the detection of Brucella genus and species; and REP-PCR was used for Brucella sp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We attempted to evaluate the molecular markers reported by different authors; however, a contradiction or failure to reproduce them limits the applicability of these markers. The primers designed in the current study, along with IS711 ( 28 ), were able to diagnose brucellosis in 1.27% (CI: 0.56–3.11) of animal samples (1.05% samples were positive for at least one serological and molecular test). The designed primers successfully amplified in the positive control ( B. abortus DNA provided by IVRI, Bareilly), and the amplicons of unidentified samples sequenced using Sanger sequencing confirmed the applicability of these markers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We attempted to evaluate the molecular markers reported by different authors; however, a contradiction or failure to reproduce them limits the applicability of these markers. The primers designed in the current study, along with IS711 ( 28 ), were able to diagnose brucellosis in 1.27% (CI: 0.56–3.11) of animal samples (1.05% samples were positive for at least one serological and molecular test). The designed primers successfully amplified in the positive control ( B. abortus DNA provided by IVRI, Bareilly), and the amplicons of unidentified samples sequenced using Sanger sequencing confirmed the applicability of these markers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Primer specificity was analyzed for different species of Brucella and checked for any non-specific binding in the host genome (five livestock species sampled for the current study) using Primer blast ( 27 ). After optimization with unknown samples and positive control sample, we finally used the following primer sets in the present study IS711 primers ( 28 ) and genus-specific primer 1 (GSP-1; designed for the present study as mentioned earlier) ( Table 1 ). The DNA sequence comparisons with the GenBank database were searched and assessed for species or genus assignment using BLAST search ( 29 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Rep-PCR is a conventional and broadly used technique in microbiology and genetic diversity. Such as plant pathogenic bacteria wilt of Solanaceaous vegetables R. solanacearum (Hossain et al 2022), fungal disease strawberry anthracnose (Karimi et al 2019), and zoonotic disease brucellosis (Amoupour et al 2019). In this study, using rep-PCR technique, the genetic diversity of 60 walnut bacterial-associated bacteria from different regions was investigated through three sets of primers (ERIC, BOX, and REP).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these procedures are expensive and are not readily available, particularly in developing countries such as Egypt. Alternatively, several studies have employed more cost effective discrimination approaches, such as IS 711 gene sequence variations, PCR restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP), and Repetitive element sequence-based PCR (rep-PCR) [ [10] , [11] , [12] ]. However, the high genetic similarity between Brucella species can occasionally reduce the efficiency of these tools in discriminating between isolates of same species, especially when these tools were used individually [ 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%