1976
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.mi.30.100176.002113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DIFFERENTIATION IN THE CAULOBACTER CELL CYCLE

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
77
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
2
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We specifically focused on C. crescentus, because Caulobacter MreB is essential and regulates cell morphology, chromosome segregation, and polar protein localization (8)(9)(10). Caulobacter also has an inherently asymmetric life cycle: With each cell cycle, it constructs a cellular extension (known as a stalk) at one pole of the cell [stalked (ST) pole] and a flagellum at the opposite pole (swarmer pole), such that division gives rise to two daughter cells that differ in polar morphology, size, and cell fate (23). With each cell cycle, Caulobacter MreB forms a dynamic spiral that condenses into a ring positioned at the future division plane and then expands back into a lengthwise spiral (8).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We specifically focused on C. crescentus, because Caulobacter MreB is essential and regulates cell morphology, chromosome segregation, and polar protein localization (8)(9)(10). Caulobacter also has an inherently asymmetric life cycle: With each cell cycle, it constructs a cellular extension (known as a stalk) at one pole of the cell [stalked (ST) pole] and a flagellum at the opposite pole (swarmer pole), such that division gives rise to two daughter cells that differ in polar morphology, size, and cell fate (23). With each cell cycle, Caulobacter MreB forms a dynamic spiral that condenses into a ring positioned at the future division plane and then expands back into a lengthwise spiral (8).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…E. coli, Sulmonella tlphirnuriurn, Caulohacter crescentus, My.~ococcus xanthus, Beneckea hurreyi and A Icaligenes cwtrophuv (Pastan & Adhya. 1976;Shapiro, 1976;Orlowski, 1980;Nealson & Hastings, 1979;Tait et al, 1981). In this study, ["]CAMP binding activity was detected in several strains of B. pertussis and, on average, was approximately half that obtained from the wild-type E. coli Crp+ and approximately four times that obtained for E. coli crp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Caulobacter may prevent the release of such population-endangering factors by killing severely damaged cells, thereby sacrificing a small number of damaged bacteria rather than releasing a large number of agents that could threaten the entire population. The potential role for BapE in eliminating phage induction may thus explain why no prophages have been found in wild-type Caulobacter strains (12).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 A and B). Cell death is surprising given that SOS-induced bacterial lysis has generally been associated with prophage induction (10,11), but Caulobacter laboratory strains do not host any temperate phage (12). Therefore, we tested the possibility that Caulobacter induced an apoptotic-like cell death pathway by staining these cells with two markers of apoptotic death, DIBAC4(3), a voltage-sensitive fluorescent dye that is stimulated by the membrane depolarization associated with eukaryotic apoptosis (13,14), and TUNEL, which labels the ends of fragmented chromosomes and is also characteristic of eukaryotic apoptosis (15).…”
Section: Dna Damage Stimulates Apoptotic-like Death In Caulobactermentioning
confidence: 99%