2012
DOI: 10.3892/mco.2012.20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differentiation between sessile serrated adenoma/polyp and non-sessile serrated adenoma/polyp in large hyper plastic polyp: A Japanese collaborative study

Abstract: A hyperplastic polyp (HP) >10 mm is described as a large hyperplastic polyp (LHP). Previous studies have considered LHP and sessile serrated adenoma/polyp (SSA/P) as synonymous. Although HP and SSA/P have previously been morphologically distinguished, differences between LHP and SSA/P have not yet been reported. The present study aimed to define the differences between SSA/P and non-SSA/P in LHP using immunohistochemistry for Ki67. Colorectal serrated lesions (>10 mm) that were completely resected by endoscope… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, SSA / Ps were more often located in the proximal colon and were larger than HPs. These clinicopathological features are consistent with those reported previously 6,[15][16][17][18] .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In this study, SSA / Ps were more often located in the proximal colon and were larger than HPs. These clinicopathological features are consistent with those reported previously 6,[15][16][17][18] .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…When we compared SSA / Ps to non-SSA / Ps with a hyperplastic pattern, SSA / Ps were more often located in the proximal colon, had a super cial appearance, and were larger than non-SSA / Ps. These results are similar to those reported previously 4,[19][20][21][22] .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The aim of this study was to evaluate whether this grading system can predict metastasis or recurrence, to validate the Ki67 index criteria of gastrointestinal NETs of the WHO 2010 classification, and to especially clarify the uncertainty in assessment of tumors with Ki67 index between 2—3%. We performed computer-assisted cytometrical analysis of Ki67 immunohistochemistry (IHC), which was established in several of our past studies [12,13], using the WinRooF image processing software (Mitani Corp., Tokyo, Japan).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%