2012
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a3106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differentiation between Brain Glioblastoma Multiforme and Solitary Metastasis: Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis Based on Routine MR Imaging

Abstract: BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:The differentiation between cerebral GBM and solitary MET is clinically important and may be radiologically challenging. Our hypothesis is that routine MR imaging with qualitative and quantitative analysis is helpful for this differentiation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The numerical values for tumor ADC are in line with previous investigations of cerebral metastases which would be expected given the standard methods and protocols used for imaging and analysis [6,7,10,13,14,22,23]. We used a variety of methods of taking measurements from the ADC maps so as not to miss an effect due to our measurement technique.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The numerical values for tumor ADC are in line with previous investigations of cerebral metastases which would be expected given the standard methods and protocols used for imaging and analysis [6,7,10,13,14,22,23]. We used a variety of methods of taking measurements from the ADC maps so as not to miss an effect due to our measurement technique.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…GBM typically presents with both gadolinium-enhancement, as visible by T1-weighted MRI with contrast, and significant peritumoral edema, as seen by T2-weighted imaging [52][53][54]. Tumor response and relapse have historically been detected following the same criteria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GL261-Quad cell line is engineered to express the model antigens human gp100 [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] , chicken OVA 257-264 , chicken OVA [323][324][325][326][327][328][329][330][331][332][333][334][335][336][337][338][339] , and mouse alloantigen I-Ea [52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68] . Female 6-8-week-old C57BL/6 mice (The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA) were inoculated by stereotactic injection of 6.0×10 4 -1.0×10 5 GL261 or GL261-Quad cells into the right striatum.…”
Section: Gl261 Tumor Implantationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, lower classification rates (60-F o r P e e r R e v i e w 6 80%) or <0.8 average AUC were reported to distinguish GBM and MET in other previous studies (13,14,16,17,(22)(23)(24)(25).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%