1955
DOI: 10.1126/science.122.3182.1234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differentiation and Separation of the Tetracycline Antibiotics by Countercurrent Distribution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1957
1957
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well-known that the recovery efficiency of cocurrent operation cannot exceed one theoretical separation stage. Countercurrent operation is a common method to increase the recovery efficiency. Most conventional types of extraction equipment mentioned above are generally counter-current-flow operated. However, it is difficult to realize countercurrent flow in microfluidic devices because the surface wetting and viscosity effects are much larger than gravity and inertial effects .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well-known that the recovery efficiency of cocurrent operation cannot exceed one theoretical separation stage. Countercurrent operation is a common method to increase the recovery efficiency. Most conventional types of extraction equipment mentioned above are generally counter-current-flow operated. However, it is difficult to realize countercurrent flow in microfluidic devices because the surface wetting and viscosity effects are much larger than gravity and inertial effects .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though the mass transfer speed is much faster than that of the conventional extractors, the recovery efficiency of the cocurrent microextraction can reach no higher than that of a conventional device with a single theoretical separation stage. To increase recovery efficiency, countercurrent flow of two immiscible liquids to achieve multi-stage extraction is often used, [19][20][21][22] but it is difficult to realize countercurrent flow at the micro-scale because viscosity and surface wetting dominate over gravity and inertial effects. 23 Difficulty in achieving countercurrent two-phase flow has been a barrier to the application of microextraction in chemical processes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%