2014
DOI: 10.4103/2229-5070.129163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differentiating Schistosoma haematobium from Schistosoma magrebowiei and other closely related schistosomes by polymerase chain reaction amplification of a species specific mitochondrial gene

Abstract: Introduction:Schistosoma haematobium infection afflicts about 150 million people in 53 countries in Africa and the Middle East. In many endemic areas, S. haematobium is sympatric with Schistosoma bovis, Schistosoma mattheei, Schistosoma curassoni, Schistosoma intercalatum and Schistosoma magrebowiei, its closely related species. In addition, they also develop in the same intermediate snail hosts. Since these schistosome species often infect snails inhabiting the same bodies of water, examining cercariae or inf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Dra1 LF-RPA specificity to schistosome DNA was high with no cross-reaction with Enterobacteria or human gDNA. As found previously with RT-PCR [ 24 ], RPA Dra1 cross-amplification with S. mansoni was 1000 fold less sensitive than for S. haematobium but as predicted cross-amplification was successful with S. curassoni and S. bovis, both members of the S. haematobium group, known to possess the Dra1 repeat sequence [ 25 ]. Thus there is potential to utilise this assay and / or develop alternative species-specific assays for the identification of other S. haematobium -group species infections in livestock and humans.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The Dra1 LF-RPA specificity to schistosome DNA was high with no cross-reaction with Enterobacteria or human gDNA. As found previously with RT-PCR [ 24 ], RPA Dra1 cross-amplification with S. mansoni was 1000 fold less sensitive than for S. haematobium but as predicted cross-amplification was successful with S. curassoni and S. bovis, both members of the S. haematobium group, known to possess the Dra1 repeat sequence [ 25 ]. Thus there is potential to utilise this assay and / or develop alternative species-specific assays for the identification of other S. haematobium -group species infections in livestock and humans.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Molecular identification of paramphistome species from Asia and elsewhere in Africa has been carried out (Lotfy et al, 2010); however, at time of writing this review, there are no records of such studies having been carried out in Nigeria. However, PCR to amplify species-specific genes has been used in differentiating human species of Schistosoma in Nigeria (Akinwale et al, 2014) and also to identify S. bovis in Kenya (Kamanja et al, 2011).…”
Section: Molecular Identification Of Trematode Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method was successfully applied to detect S. japonicum DNA in human stool samples [ 28 , 52 , 53 ] with low-intensity infections, and in pig feces [ 54 ]. Recently, a specific and efficient PCR assay based on NADH-3 [GenBank accession no: KF834975] was described and successfully used to detect snails and urine samples of patients infected with schistosome [ 55 ]. This approach can accurately differentiate S. haematobium from S. bovis , S. mattheei , S. curassoni , S. intercalatum , and S. magrebowiei , indicating a potential application in the identification of a coinfection.…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method may enable the accurate evaluation of infected snails where S. haematobium is coexistent with other prevalent schistosome species. Recently, a simple and efficient PCR technique based on the mitochondrial gene NADH-3 [GenBank accession no: KF834975] was described [ 55 ]. Its detection limit was shown to be 1 pg and no cross-reactions with other related schistosomes were observed.…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%