2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2005.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differentiating mechanisms of toxicity using global gene expression analysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
63
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two other proteins identified in our study that affect sulfide production, Sit4p and Iki3p, are also known to form a complex with Hht2p (15,23,37). SIT4 is involved in transcriptional regulation (9), and IKI3 encodes for a subunit of the elongator complex (7,22,23). The fact that deletion of all three of these genes leads to increased H 2 S suggests that the reported interaction of their gene products is of biological significance and this complex exerts some form of regulation on the reduction of sulfide, either directly or indirectly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Two other proteins identified in our study that affect sulfide production, Sit4p and Iki3p, are also known to form a complex with Hht2p (15,23,37). SIT4 is involved in transcriptional regulation (9), and IKI3 encodes for a subunit of the elongator complex (7,22,23). The fact that deletion of all three of these genes leads to increased H 2 S suggests that the reported interaction of their gene products is of biological significance and this complex exerts some form of regulation on the reduction of sulfide, either directly or indirectly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…9). Thirty-three of the 64 genes have been implicated in DNA damage response from previous microarray studies (14,16,23,33). Of these 33 genes, all but one had inferred regulatory directions that were consistent with current knowledge about the DNA damage response.…”
Section: (See Si Materials and Methods)mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Based on these results, the 56MESS concentration of 0.45 mM (between 0.40 and 0.50 mM), which caused significant growth inhibition, yet not substantial cell death, was chosen for genome-wide expression profiling of yeast response to 56MESS. This level of dosage was previously used in gene expression profiling studies in yeast for cellular response to drug treatments and certain environmental conditions [9,22]. Changes in gene expression and identification of major biological processes in response to 56MESS treatment To uncover genes important to the cytotoxicity of 56MESS, cDNA microarray technology was used to measure the changes of genome-wide gene expression after treatment for 1 h with 0.45 mM 56MESS.…”
Section: Cytotoxicity Of 56mess In the Cisplatin-resistant L1210cisr mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model eukaryotic organism, yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, plays a significant role in this approach [68] due to its easy amendability with various experimental approaches and conservation of genes and essential cellular functions with humans [3]. Application of yeast transcriptomics has already yielded insights on the genes and molecular mechanisms of cisplatin [9,23]. We therefore employed yeast transcriptomics in this study to uncover the genes and molecular pathways underpinning the cytotoxicity of 56MESS following the assessment of 56MESS activity in a cisplatin-resistant cancer cell line L1210cisR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%