2007
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2452061805
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differentiating Benign from Malignant Solid Breast Masses with US Strain Imaging

Abstract: US strain imaging can facilitate improved classification of benign and malignant breast masses. However, interobserver variability and image quality influence observer performance.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

8
199
0
7

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 280 publications
(214 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
8
199
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…8 Malignant tumors have reduced elasticity and also display larger dimensions on elastography due to accompanying desmoplastic reaction. 9 The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic utility of SE in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions in peripheral part of West Bengal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Malignant tumors have reduced elasticity and also display larger dimensions on elastography due to accompanying desmoplastic reaction. 9 The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic utility of SE in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions in peripheral part of West Bengal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinical potential of elasticity imaging has been demonstrated in imaging breast (Regner et al 2006;Burnside et al 2007), cardiovascular disease (Pislaru et al 2004;Trahey et al 2004), and fibrosis (Sandrin et al 2003), amongst others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this evaluation, a software is used in which soft lesions seem to be bright, hard lesions seem to be dark and malignant lesions are more specific than benign lesions. On the other hand tissues seem to be in different color spectrum according to their hardness [6][7][8][9][10][11]. Yet, there is no agreement on the method or classification which has the most clinical applicability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%