2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.diii.2020.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differentiating autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with CT radiomics features

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
37
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Radiomics, Texture Analysis) in the differentiation of focal autoimmune pancreatitis and isolated IRC from pancreatic cancer and cholangiocarcinoma, respectively. 223 • as there have been no randomized controlled studies on the treatment of IgG4-related digestive disease, the best evidence-based treatment of this disorder is still unknown. The use of certain medications for treatment of IgG4-related digestive disease varies in different countries, among different specialties, and different organ involvement; therefore, multicentre clinical trials with large numbers of patients are needed to define optimal treatment protocols.…”
Section: Areas Of Uncertainty and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Radiomics, Texture Analysis) in the differentiation of focal autoimmune pancreatitis and isolated IRC from pancreatic cancer and cholangiocarcinoma, respectively. 223 • as there have been no randomized controlled studies on the treatment of IgG4-related digestive disease, the best evidence-based treatment of this disorder is still unknown. The use of certain medications for treatment of IgG4-related digestive disease varies in different countries, among different specialties, and different organ involvement; therefore, multicentre clinical trials with large numbers of patients are needed to define optimal treatment protocols.…”
Section: Areas Of Uncertainty and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major topics are the following: incidence of cancer in patients with IgG4‐related digestive disease compared with age‐, sex‐ and risk factor‐matched control subjects, and any risk factors for its development should be explored in prospective studies. prospective studies to evaluate the accuracy of imaging modalities (CT, MR, PET‐CT) even with the aid of innovative post‐processing methods (i.e. Radiomics, Texture Analysis) in the differentiation of focal autoimmune pancreatitis and isolated IRC from pancreatic cancer and cholangiocarcinoma, respectively 223 as there have been no randomized controlled studies on the treatment of IgG4‐related digestive disease, the best evidence‐based treatment of this disorder is still unknown.…”
Section: Areas Of Uncertainty and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These hand-crafted features have been shown to be prognostic for survival and recurrence in different cancer sites (Kumar et al, 2012;Balagurunathan et al, 2014;Haider et al, 2017). In the PDAC radiomics field, more than forty features have been found to be significantly associated with tissue classification or overall survival for PDAC patients (e.g., sum entropy, cluster tendency, dissimilarity, uniformity, and busyness) (Cassinotto et al, 2017;Chakraborty et al, 2017;Attiyeh et al, 2018;Yun et al, 2018;Chu et al, 2019;Sandrasegaran et al, 2019;Li et al, 2020;Park et al, 2020). Furthermore, a few radiomics features have been found to be associated with tumor heterogeneity and genomics profile (Lambin et al, 2012;Itakura et al, 2015;Rizzo et al, 2016;Li et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different clinical and radiological modalities, including serum IgG4, CA19‐9, tumour‐specific antigens, gene expression, endoscopic ultrasonography, computerised tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), have been explored for differentiating AIP from pancreatic cancer. Radiological studies can be suggestive, but not diagnostic 5,21,22 . Serum IgG4 levels above twice the upper limit of normal are often seen in type 1 AIP, but the sensitivity is not perfect 23–26 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a mimic of neoplasia in its clinical, radiological and histological features 1–7 . Current consensus divides AIP into two subtypes 2–8 . Type 1 AIP is a manifestation of immunoglobulin (Ig)G4‐related disease and is also known as lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%