2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.anl.2018.05.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differentiating among conductive hearing loss conditions with wideband tympanometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We know from previous works regarding absorbance results, that the conductive alterations generate less sound absorbance, due to the greater rigidity of the system [ 22 25 ]. Even though, the values observed were within the normal range in high frequencies, the C group has the absorbance values closer to the expected normality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We know from previous works regarding absorbance results, that the conductive alterations generate less sound absorbance, due to the greater rigidity of the system [ 22 25 ]. Even though, the values observed were within the normal range in high frequencies, the C group has the absorbance values closer to the expected normality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can also provide more information about patients with mastoid problems [8,9]. Data from a recent study justifies the larger applications of WBT, as it can differentiate between different conductive hearing loss conditions [10]. Otoacoustic emissions have low diagnostic value, the presence of conductive hearing loss is sufficient to reduce the clinical utility of distortion product otoacoustic (DPOAE).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…WBA performed at ambient air pressure (WBA a ) is well suited to identify CHL and middle-ear pathology. Reduced WBA a values can identify these conditions in adults (Margolis et al 1999; Shahnaz et al 2009; Kim et al 2019) and children (Keefe & Simmons 2003; Beers et al 2010; Ellison et al 2012; Keefe et al 2012) with high accuracy. Further, WBA a is a more accurate predictor of CHL in children, for whom CHL is highly prevalent, than conventional tympanometry (Keefe & Simmons 2003; Beers et al 2010; Keefe et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%