2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.03.1124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differentiating adenomas from hyperplastic colorectal polyps: narrow-band imaging can be learned in 20 minutes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
103
3
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
10
103
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This indirectly indicates a learning curve. A previous study indicated that NBI in differentiation of colonic polyps could be learned in 20 min by didactic lecturing [16]. In our study, a Power Point presentation for 15 min does not seem to be sufficient to improve the IOA and accuracy of AFI in dysplasia identification.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 78%
“…This indirectly indicates a learning curve. A previous study indicated that NBI in differentiation of colonic polyps could be learned in 20 min by didactic lecturing [16]. In our study, a Power Point presentation for 15 min does not seem to be sufficient to improve the IOA and accuracy of AFI in dysplasia identification.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 78%
“…Recent studies have reported outcomes of training in NBI with magnification. These studies revealed that a 20-60 min training lecture could increase the differential diagnostic skills of operators inexperienced in NBI with magnification to expert levels [28,29]. Short training courses in FICE with magnification properly conducted in our institution potentially offer the same effectiveness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The evidence from nonexperts (30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39) provides some cautionary notes (Table 2). Several studies have shown that training modules can improve accuracy among non-expert endoscopists (31)(32)(33)(34)(35), and many nonexperts achieve PIVI thresholds when training is evaluated ex-vivo (Table 2). However, invivo studies demonstrate considerable variation between expert and non-expert endoscopists.…”
Section: What Is the Current Evidence Supporting The Use Of Endoscopimentioning
confidence: 99%