2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differentiated effects of formal and informal institutional distance between countries on the environmental performance of multinational enterprises

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
1
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
35
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Analysing how national institutions influence multinationals to practice corporate social responsibility, Marano and Kostova (2016) find that the strongest pressure occurs when the company depends economically on the country or when the country is a leader in CSR. Aguilera‐Caracuel, Hurtado‐Torres, Aragón‐Correa, and Rugman (2013) analyse how multinationals negotiate institutional differences (formal and informal) in the countries in which they operate to develop an approach that standardizes the firm's institutional approach to environmental impact to meet the pressures across these countries. Aguilera‐Caracuel and Guerrero‐Villegas (2018) find that multinationals undergoing geographical international diversification or operating in developing regions may intensify environmentally and/or socially conscious strategies to improve corporate image.…”
Section: Literature Review and Development Of Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Analysing how national institutions influence multinationals to practice corporate social responsibility, Marano and Kostova (2016) find that the strongest pressure occurs when the company depends economically on the country or when the country is a leader in CSR. Aguilera‐Caracuel, Hurtado‐Torres, Aragón‐Correa, and Rugman (2013) analyse how multinationals negotiate institutional differences (formal and informal) in the countries in which they operate to develop an approach that standardizes the firm's institutional approach to environmental impact to meet the pressures across these countries. Aguilera‐Caracuel and Guerrero‐Villegas (2018) find that multinationals undergoing geographical international diversification or operating in developing regions may intensify environmentally and/or socially conscious strategies to improve corporate image.…”
Section: Literature Review and Development Of Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can thus extend institutional theory to argue that Multilatinas seek legitimacy by responding to the pressures (mimetic, regulatory and coercive) in their institutional context. In response to coercive pressure, they will establish EMS to avoid government sanctions (Aguilera‐Caracuel et al, 2013) and demonstrate environmental commitment to customers, regulatory agencies and other institutions (Nishitani, 2010). Second, mimetic pressures lead Multilatinas to search for and adopt best practices and standards in their institutional field (Delmas & Toffel, 2004; Kostova, Roth, & Dacin, 2008).…”
Section: Literature Review and Development Of Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perego & Kolk, 2012; Aguilera-Caracuel, Hurtado-Torres, Aragón-Correa, & Rugman, 2013 Instrumental rationality Calculation of benefits can help in "de-coupling" environmental impact from economic growth.…”
Section: Bäckstrand 2003;mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This variation has influenced studies that examine institutional pressure on multinational responsiveness (Perez-Aleman & Sandilands, 2008;Perego & Kolk, 2012;Aguilera-Caracuel et al, 2013;Fleury & Fleury, 2014) and the level of private involvement that contributes to sustainability (Koppenjan & Enserink, 2009).…”
Section: Multinationals and Sustainability Partnershipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No obstante, otros estudios muestran que, a través de la internacionalización, las empresas, van a tener una mayor oportunidad para aprender puesto que están expuestas a diferentes ideas provenientes de diferentes mercados con peculiaridades culturales, institucionales (Kochhar y Hitt, 1995) así como exigencias propias en materia social (Strike et al, 2006) y medioambiental (Aguilera-Caracuel et al, 2013). Concretamente, las empresas van a poder adquirir conocimientos valiosos que les permitan responder a las expectativas de los diferentes grupos de interés, gestionar las diferencias regulatorias entre los diferentes países, establecer acuerdos y colaboraciones con otras organizaciones e instituciones, desarrollar habilidades de negociación con gobiernos e instituciones públicas basadas en la confianza y cooperación, y reforzar sus estándares sociales y medioambientales a lo largo de su entramado organizativo (Strike et al, 2006).…”
Section: Teoría De Conocimiento Internacionalización Y Desempeño Socialunclassified