2017
DOI: 10.1099/jgv.0.000744
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differentially expressed genes during spontaneous lytic switch of Marek's disease virus in lymphoblastoid cell lines determined by global gene expression profiling

Abstract: Marek’s disease virus (MDV), an alphaherpesvirus of poultry, causes Marek’s disease and is characterized by visceral CD4+TCRαβ+ T-cell lymphomas in susceptible hosts. Immortal cell lines harbouring the viral genome have been generated from ex vivo cultures of MD tumours. As readily available sources of large numbers of cells, MDV-transformed lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) are extremely valuable for studies of virus–host interaction. While the viral genome in most cells is held in a latent state, minor popula… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(44 reference statements)
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MDV-encoded pp38 is considered to be one of the best biomarkers of the latency-to-lytic switch in the LCL, where most of the MDV genome is held in a latent state, thought to be through epigenetic mechanisms [30]. However, previous studies have shown that between 1–10% of the MSB-1 population expressed pp38 at low levels [31,40]. Lytic replication in LCL can be induced with histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors such as NaB or methylation inhibitor AZA [30].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…MDV-encoded pp38 is considered to be one of the best biomarkers of the latency-to-lytic switch in the LCL, where most of the MDV genome is held in a latent state, thought to be through epigenetic mechanisms [30]. However, previous studies have shown that between 1–10% of the MSB-1 population expressed pp38 at low levels [31,40]. Lytic replication in LCL can be induced with histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors such as NaB or methylation inhibitor AZA [30].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus far, most of the data on MDV gene expression during the neoplastic stages of the disease have come from lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCL) derived from MD lymphomas. As clonal populations of transformed tumor cells with latent MDV genome and limited gene expression [29,30,31], LCLs provide an extremely valuable source to study the latency, reactivation, and transformation in situ. However, the manipulation of the viral and host genes in these cell lines hitherto has been challenging primarily because of the lack of availability of efficient tools.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MDV encodes about 100 proteins that orchestrate the virus life cycle and/or contribute to pathogenesis [12,14]. Until now, analyses of the viral transcriptome has been limited to chicken fibroblasts that are not infected in chickens, ex vivo samples [15,16] and tumor cells [17]; however, the mRNA expression in the primary target cells of lytic replication in vivo remained elusive. This is mainly due to the short lifespan of B and T cells in culture and the low quantity of infected cells in lymphoid organs of chickens [7,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the role of miR-M4 in the induction of MD lymphomas has been clearly demonstrated in these studies, it remains unclear whether continued high-level expression of miR-M4 is essential for maintaining the transformed phenotype of MDV-transformed tumor cells. As clonal populations of transformed tumor cells with latent MDV genome and limited gene expression (3032), lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCL) derived from MD lymphomas have served as valuable resources to improve understanding of distinct aspects of virus-host interactions in transformed cells. However, detailed investigations into the role of different viral and host determinants in these cells have been difficult due to the lack of tools for manipulation of viral/host genomes of these cells in situ .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%