Differential vegetable crop responses to mesotrione soil residues a year after application

Felix, Joel; Doohan, Douglas; Bruins, D. Z.

doi:10.1016/j.cropro.2006.11.013

Cited by 38 publications

(48 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Differences have been also reported between different crop cultivars in response to the same or different herbicides (Duwayri & Saghir, 1983;Felix et al, 2007;Abit at al., 2009;Kong et al, 2009& Jin et al, 2010 hence differ in morphology, physiology, growth habit and phenology. In addition, cultivars are different in germination, emergence, growth development and duration, physiological and biochemical responses (Grime, 1986).…”

Section: Crop Species /Varietiesmentioning

confidence: 98%

“…All these factors could affect herbicide sensitivity or tolerance of crop plants. However, differences were detected on families, species and cultivars levels in response to herbicides and therefore any selective herbicide on a specific crop cultivar may confer injury to other cultivars (Felix et al, 2007;Abit at al., 2009;Kong et al, 2009;Jin et al, 2010). However, production of cuticular wax tends to be reduced under warm humid conditions which may resulted in a higher retention of spray solution on crop leaves and more injury under such conditions.…”

Section: Crop Morphologymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Label shows herbicide trade and common names and carry important information on herbicide selectivity, formulation, active ingredient, volume of spray solution or carrier required per unit area, method of application, time of herbicide application, rate of application, post-application treatments, persistence (carry-over) (Felix et al, 2007), weed species affected, and crops in which the herbicide is recommended, weed control spectrum and tolerant weeds, volatility and conditions under which the herbicide is selectively used and any possible crop injures and precautions. All these information are of high value for the farmer and must be consulted and strictly followed if a successful weed control operation is the ultimate farmers' goal.…”

Section: Labels and Technical Pamphletsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Herbicides Applications: Problems and Considerations

Qasem¹

2011

Herbicides and Environment

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Crop Species /Varietiesmentioning

confidence: 98%

Section: Crop Morphologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Labels and Technical Pamphletsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Herbicides Applications: Problems and Considerations

Qasem¹

2011

Herbicides and Environment

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Preliminary studies have confirmed that herbicide residues in soil are responsible for causing malformation and cranny of outer leaf of garlic seed-bulb compromising the quality for trade (personal communication). Felix et al (2007) Given the sensitivity of cultures to herbicide residues in the soil, precautions must be taken with the use of products based on its physical and chemical characteristics and rotation programs established for each area.…”

Section: Herbicides Carryover In Vegetable Cropsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Carryover de herbicidas em sistemas cultivados com olerícolas

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

O efeito residual de herbicidas no solo sobre culturas sucessoras sensíveis é conhecido como carryover. A maioria dos estudos sobre carryover em olerícolas tem sido desenvolvida em outros países, no entanto, os problemas advindos desse fenômeno são uma realidade também no Brasil. A limitada informação presente na literatura, aliada à ausência de alertas e períodos de restrição nas bulas dos herbicidas comercializados no país para o cultivo de olerícolas sensíveis em sucessão contribuem para a ocorrência de grandes prejuízos aos olericultores. Carryover de herbicidas pode causar intoxicação de forma visível ou não nas olerícolas, reduzir o crescimento e a produtividade, assim como comprometer a qualidade do produto e até mesmo inviabilizar a área para o cultivo por anos. A presente revisão descreve a dinâmica dos herbicidas no solo e reúne diversos trabalhos acerca do efeito residual de herbicidas em olerícolas. Além disso, discute as possíveis formas de monitoramento das áreas cultivadas, através da análise em laboratórios ou de bioensaios, e as estratégias para minimizar os efeitos danosos nessas culturas, que são altamente sensíveis. Nesse contexto, o manejo integrado de plantas daninhas é essencial para redução da necessidade de utilização de herbicidas e aporte desses no solo, diminuindo os riscos de carryover, além de medida legislativa para inclusão dos períodos de restrição de cultivo de olerícolas sensíveis nas bulas dos herbicidas.

show abstract

“…Injury of sensitive crops to herbicide residues that are grown 1 yr after herbicide application can result in yield reductions due to herbicide persistence (Curran et al 1996;Helling 2005). For example, several vegetable crop species are sensitive to residual commercial herbicides like imazethapyr (O'Sullivan et al 1998), mesotrione (Felix et al 2007), and saflufenacil (Robinson and McNaughton 2012). A related concern for which growers lack sufficient understanding is the effect of residues from herbicides applied in the previous year on cover crop growth and effectiveness.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Response of four spring-seeded cover crops to residues of selected herbicides

YuLi¹,

EerdLaura

O’Halloran

et al. 2015

Can. J. Plant Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

. 2015. Response of four spring-seeded cover crops to residues of selected herbicides. Can. J. Plant Sci. 95: 303Á313. Although herbicide labels provide crop rotation restrictions, information is limited on the influence of herbicide residues on cover crops. Field experiments were conducted in 2011/2012 and 2012/2013 in Ontario, Canada, to characterize the effects of soil residues of selected herbicides on establishment and growth of buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench), annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.), sorghum sudangrass [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench )Sorghum sudanense (P.) Stapf], and spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) spring-seeded cover crops planted 1 yr after application. Imazethapyr (100 and 200 g ha ) was applied pre-emergence (PRE) to processing peas (Pisum sativum L.), while S-metolachlor/atrazine plus mesotrione (2880'140 and 5760'280 g ha (1 ) and saflufenacil/ dimethenamid-P (735 and 1470 g ha(1 ) were applied PRE to sweet corn (Zea mays L.). Imazethapyr residues from 200 g ha(1 caused 75 and 48% visible injury in buckwheat and sorghum sudangrass, respectively. Plant light attenuation, shoot dry weight, and nitrate-nitrogen content were reduced up to 82, 64 and 67% in buckwheat, and 40, 11 and 24% in sorghum sudangrass, respectively, by residues from imazethapyr. S-metolachlor/atrazine plus mesotrione residues caused up to 53% visible injury to annual ryegrass and reduced plant light attenuation, shoot dry weight, and nitrate-nitrogen content by as much as 59, 48, and 55%, respectively. There were no observable adverse effects of visible injury, light attenuation, shoot dry weight, and nitrate-nitrogen content on spring wheat regardless of herbicide or rate. These results indicate that buckwheat and sorghum sudangrass should not be grown in the year following imazethapyr, and that annual ryegrass should not be grown in the year after application of S-metolachlor/atrazine plus mesotrione. However, no restrictions are needed for growing spring wheat following these herbicides. 0, 11 et 24 % chez le sorgho. Les re´sidus de S-metolachlor/atrazine et de mesotrione engendrent jusqu'a`53 % de dommages visibles chez le ray-grass annuel et diminuent l'atte´nuation de la lumie`re, le poids sec des pousses et la teneur en azote-nitrate de jusqu'a`59, 48 et 55 %, respectivement. L'herbicide et son taux d'application n'ont aucun effet ne´faste apparent au niveau des dommages visibles, de l'atte´nuation de la lumie`re, du poids sec des pousses et de la teneur en azote-nitrate pour le ble´de printemps. Ces re´sultats indiquent qu'on ne devrait pas cultiver du sarrasin ni du sorgho l'anne´e suivant l'application d'imazethapyr et qu'on ne devrait pas semer du ray-grass annuel l'anne´e suivant l'application de S-metolachlor/atrazine et de mesotrione. Toutefois, aucune restriction ne s'applique au ble´de printemps apre`s l'utilisation de ces herbicides.Mots clé s: Cultures-abris, re´sidus d'herbicide, absorption de l'azote, atte´nuation de la lumie`re Crop rotation is one of the major factors conside...

show abstract

Differential vegetable crop responses to mesotrione soil residues a year after application

Cited by 38 publications

References 12 publications

Herbicides Applications: Problems and Considerations

Herbicides Applications: Problems and Considerations

Carryover de herbicidas em sistemas cultivados com olerícolas

Response of four spring-seeded cover crops to residues of selected herbicides

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About