2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-021-04564-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential use of artificial habitats by native and non-native fish species in Neotropical reservoirs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hydrological alterations including changes in flow regime (dams, reservoirs) and water abstraction are some of the key stressors affecting native freshwater biodiversity, and these alterations often favor invasive species and lead to homogenization of freshwater faunas (e.g., Havel et al, 2015). Reservoirs increase establishment and dominance of AIS (e.g., Havel et al, 2015), and some types of artificial structures used to enhance fish habitat in reservoirs seem to preferentially benefit invasive fish (Frehse et al, 2021). A comparison of natural and anthropogenically modified (by damming, channelization and drained floodplains) stretches of a coastal river in Brazil found that non-native species occurred mainly in the disturbed stretches (Santos et al, 2021a).…”
Section: Impacts Of Aismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hydrological alterations including changes in flow regime (dams, reservoirs) and water abstraction are some of the key stressors affecting native freshwater biodiversity, and these alterations often favor invasive species and lead to homogenization of freshwater faunas (e.g., Havel et al, 2015). Reservoirs increase establishment and dominance of AIS (e.g., Havel et al, 2015), and some types of artificial structures used to enhance fish habitat in reservoirs seem to preferentially benefit invasive fish (Frehse et al, 2021). A comparison of natural and anthropogenically modified (by damming, channelization and drained floodplains) stretches of a coastal river in Brazil found that non-native species occurred mainly in the disturbed stretches (Santos et al, 2021a).…”
Section: Impacts Of Aismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This species has omnivorous habits, sedentary behaviour and an equilibrium life‐history strategy (Bastos et al, 2011), which explain its success in colonising habitats with more stable flows. Other studies in southern Brazil also have reported major increases in abundances of G. brasiliensis after dam closures (Borba et al, 2019; Frehse et al, 2021; Hirschmann et al, 2008), reinforcing its high affinity with artificial lentic habitats.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…More careful management of habitat in modified lowland regions is required, but is poorly understood (Chester & Robson, 2013; Schürings et al, 2022) and considerations for fish habitat are lacking in pumped artificial drains. Elsewhere, artificial habitats have been introduced to supplement degraded natural habitats (Allen et al, 2014) and increase local abundance of fish (Frehse et al, 2021). Thus, introducing artificial habitats in artificial drains could provide fish with refuge from resident aquatic and avian predators when pumps do not operate and provide flow refuge during pump operation (Lemmens et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More careful management of habitat in modified lowland regions is required, but is poorly understood (Chester & Robson, 2013;Schürings et al, 2022) and considerations for fish habitat are lacking in pumped artificial drains. Elsewhere, artificial habitats have been introduced to supplement degraded natural habitats (Allen et al, 2014) and increase local abundance of fish (Frehse et al, 2021).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%