2001
DOI: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2001.96349512.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential uptake of a smoking cessation programme disseminated to doctors and midwives in antenatal clinics

Abstract: The dissemination of a smoking cessation programme increased the level of smoking cessation interventions used by doctors and midwives. Doctors and midwives differ in their uptake of smoking cessation programmes. This information can be used to plan programme dissemination strategies in the future.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
32
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar concerns have been identified in other studies with AHWs, although they report feeling more comfortable discussing smoking with pregnant smokers than with other smokers [39,56,57]. In other antenatal settings, a perception that clients are not interested or do not expect advice, has been identified as a barrier [37,52], and midwives have expressed concern about potentially damaging their relationship with women if they address their smoking [28,31,50]. By contrast, women consider provision of smoking cessation advice within antenatal care to be acceptable [26], and state that it doesn't affect their relationships with their midwives [27].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similar concerns have been identified in other studies with AHWs, although they report feeling more comfortable discussing smoking with pregnant smokers than with other smokers [39,56,57]. In other antenatal settings, a perception that clients are not interested or do not expect advice, has been identified as a barrier [37,52], and midwives have expressed concern about potentially damaging their relationship with women if they address their smoking [28,31,50]. By contrast, women consider provision of smoking cessation advice within antenatal care to be acceptable [26], and state that it doesn't affect their relationships with their midwives [27].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Smoking cessation interventions are poorly covered in nursing curricula [46] and in training for Aboriginal Health Workers [47], which may explain the low level of knowledge and that approximately one fifth felt they didn't have the skills to provide advice. Perceived skill level is associated with provision of tobacco interventions [37,48], and lack of skills have repeatedly been identified as a barrier to smoking cessation counselling by practitioners [31,49-51]. In our study, both knowledge scores and perceptions of skills were related to level of smoking assessment, suggesting that provision of culturally appropriate, pregnancy-specific training and resources would increase confidence and skills and consequently assessment and management of antenatal smoking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regarding factors affecting the use of smoking cessation interventions in antenatal clinics, one study conducted in Australia investigated perceptions, knowledge, and the use of brief interventions in midwives and physicians working in 20 hospital antenatal clinics [23]. Results showed that the majority of antenatal clinic staff did not use the most effective forms of brief cessation interventions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four papers provided no details regarding the design and construction of the survey tool (Bishop et al, 1998, Glover et al, 2008, Grange et al, 2006, Walsh et al 1995. Three papers described a development phase (Clasper & White 1995, Cooke et al, 2001, Ussher et al 2006. One paper reported that they used a survey that had been adopted in a previous study (Cooke et al, 1998) and one described the development of the tool from a review of the literature (Jordan et al, 2006).…”
Section: Quality Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%