1998
DOI: 10.1128/jvi.72.12.9441-9452.1998
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential Tropism and Replication Kinetics of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Isolates in Thymocytes: Coreceptor Expression Allows Viral Entry, but Productive Infection of Distinct Subsets Is Determined at the Postentry Level

Abstract: Human thymocytes are readily infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) in vivo and in vitro. In this study, we found that the kinetics of replication and cytopathic effects of two molecular isolates, NL4-3 and JR-CSF, in postnatal thymocytes are best explained by the distribution of chemokine receptors used for viral entry. CXCR4 was expressed at high levels on most thymocytes, whereas CCR5 expression was restricted to only 0.1 to 2% of thymocytes. The difference in the amount of proviral DNA d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Coreceptor competition may also explain earlier studies with human thymocytes in which preferential infection of doublepositive thymocytes with T-tropic viruses was observed (3,21,28,33), despite expression of low-level CCR5 in both doublepositive and single-positive thymocyte subpopulations as recently demonstrated (39). Significantly higher expression of CXCR4 compared with CCR5 was found on immature doublepositive thymocytes (but not on the mature single-positive thymocytes) (21,39).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Coreceptor competition may also explain earlier studies with human thymocytes in which preferential infection of doublepositive thymocytes with T-tropic viruses was observed (3,21,28,33), despite expression of low-level CCR5 in both doublepositive and single-positive thymocyte subpopulations as recently demonstrated (39). Significantly higher expression of CXCR4 compared with CCR5 was found on immature doublepositive thymocytes (but not on the mature single-positive thymocytes) (21,39).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Together, these data contribute to understanding the possible effects of in vivo alterations in CD4 and coreceptor densities (or coreceptor availability) on HIV-1 cell entry and disease progression. Furthermore, the development of ␤-chemokine analogs as antiviral agents (28,32,35) should take into account their potential to alter coreceptor-CD4 interactions and to alter the susceptibility of target cells to infection with viruses of different coreceptor usage (2,27,31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HIV-1 variants replicating in the thymus predominantly use CXCR4 as their coreceptor [3,4,50]. We have shown recently that the thymus plays a key role in the evolution of CXCR4 variants found in the thymus, blood, and tissues [5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thymus, the primary lymphoid organ involved in T cell maturation and differentiation, is an important tissue target for HIV-1 infection [1,2]. Thymocytes are susceptible to infection in vivo and ex vivo, predominantly by viruses that use the CXCR4 coreceptor, providing a milieu for emergence of these viruses in vivo [3][4][5][6]. As a result, HIV-1 infection leads to decreased thymic output and aberrant T cell maturation [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the SCID-hu mouse model, viral DNA sequences were detected by PCR analysis in all the thymocytes expressing the CD4 receptor (30,49). However, the kinetics of replication in the different subpopulations was shown to vary according to the viral isolates (10,49), and this is very probably related to the distribution of the chemokine receptors on the human thymocyte subsets and to their usage by the viral isolates (9,31,42,64). However, an efficient entry of the virus does not necessarily lead to a productive infection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%