2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00220-017-2965-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential Topology of Semimetals

Abstract: Abstract. The subtle interplay between local and global charges for topological semimetals exactly parallels that for singular vector fields. Part of this story is the relationship between cohomological semimetal invariants, Euler structures, and ambiguities in the connections between Weyl points. Dually, a topological semimetal can be represented by Euler chains from which its surface Fermi arc connectivity can be deduced. These dual pictures, and the link to topological invariants of insulators, are organise… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
65
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
2
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let us note that this is a generalization of the Poincaré-Hopf theorem [53][54][55], which relates zeros of a tangent vector field to the Euler characteristic of the manifold, to rank two real Bloch bundles (i.e., two real Bloch states).…”
Section: B Winding Number and The Euler Classmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let us note that this is a generalization of the Poincaré-Hopf theorem [53][54][55], which relates zeros of a tangent vector field to the Euler characteristic of the manifold, to rank two real Bloch bundles (i.e., two real Bloch states).…”
Section: B Winding Number and The Euler Classmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been a lot of efforts to classify such bulk gapless topological phases. 30,35,36,69 Whereas the bulk gapless phases resemble to gapless boundary and defect modes in TCIs and TCSCs, their theoretical treatment is different from that of the latter: While the topological structure of the latter can be examined by a bulk Hamiltonian flattened in the entire BZ, that of the former cannot be, since the information on the band touching structure is obviously lost by the flattening. Therefore, one needs a different approach to characterize gapless topological phases in the K-theory formulation.…”
Section: A Formulation By K-theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and measuring the differential integrated rate [33] ∆Γ int = ∞ 0 dω Γ + (ω) − Γ − (ω) = (8πE 2 )g µν (q 0 ), where Γ ± refer to the excitation rates resulting from the drives q ± ν (t) in Eq. (35). Such a protocol could be applied to the general threelevel Hamiltonian in Eq.…”
Section: Measuring a Tensor Monopole In A Three-level Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[33] requires driving a set of parameters {q µ (t), q ν (t)} periodically in time, which can be realized in this setting by modulating the real and imaginary parts of the Rabi amplitudes Ω 12 and Ω 23 in a proper manner; see Eqs. (33) and (35). Measuring the resulting excitation rates Γ(ω), for a proper range of drive frequencies ω, would then provide the different components of the quantum metric tensor, and hence, reveal the tensor monopole associated with this 4D model (see main text).…”
Section: Measuring a Tensor Monopole In A Three-level Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%