Differential susceptibility of blue catfish, <i>Ictalurus furcatus</i> (Valenciennes), channel catfish, <i>I. punctatus</i> (Rafinesque), and blue × channel catfish hybrids to channel catfish virus

Silverstein, Peter S.; Bosworth, Brian G.; Gaunt, Patricia S.

doi:10.1111/j.1365-2761.2007.00870.x

Cited by 22 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 5 publications

(6 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Experimental challenges of yellow bullhead Ameiurus natalis , brown bullhead A. nebulosus and black bullhead A. melas catfish, European wels catfish Silurus glanis African ( Clarias gariepinus ) and Asian catfish ( Clarias batrachus ) were resistant to infection [128–130]. Whereas blue catfish were moderately susceptible and channel × catfish hybrids were as susceptible as channel catfish [131]. IcHV1 is also very host-specific in cell culture.…”

Section: Ictalurid Herpesvirus 1 — a Model Clade 2 Herpesvirusmentioning

confidence: 99%

Herpesviruses that Infect Fish

Hanson

Dishon²,

Kotler³

2011

Viruses

138

128

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Herpesviruses are host specific pathogens that are widespread among vertebrates. Genome sequence data demonstrate that most herpesviruses of fish and amphibians are grouped together (family Alloherpesviridae) and are distantly related to herpesviruses of reptiles, birds and mammals (family Herpesviridae). Yet, many of the biological processes of members of the order Herpesvirales are similar. Among the conserved characteristics are the virion structure, replication process, the ability to establish long term latency and the manipulation of the host immune response. Many of the similar processes may be due to convergent evolution. This overview of identified herpesviruses of fish discusses the diseases that alloherpesviruses cause, the biology of these viruses and the host-pathogen interactions. Much of our knowledge on the biology of Alloherpesvirdae is derived from research with two species: Ictalurid herpesvirus 1 (channel catfish virus) and Cyprinid herpesvirus 3 (koi herpesvirus).

show abstract

Section: Ictalurid Herpesvirus 1 — a Model Clade 2 Herpesvirusmentioning

confidence: 99%

Herpesviruses that Infect Fish

Hanson

Dishon²,

Kotler³

2011

Viruses

138

128

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Because of these positive traits, an increasing number of catfish producers have opted to grow C×B hybrids despite the additional costs associated with their production, which requires artificial spawning, in contrast to the pond spawning methods used for channel catfish (Masser & Dunham 1998). Regarding disease susceptibility, the resistance of C×B hybrids to enteric septicemia of catfish (ESC) is intermediate between that of channel catfish and that of blue catfish (Wolters et al 1996), but these hybrids show no difference in resistance to channel catfish virus (CCV), proliferative gill disease (PGD), or freshwater white spot disease (caused by Ichthyophthirius multifiliis) (Bosworth et al 2003, Silverstein et al 2008, Xu et al 2011.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Catfish hybrid Ictalurus punctatus × I. furcatus exhibits higher resistance to columnaris disease than the parental species

Arias¹,

Cai²,

Peatman³

et al. 2012

Dis. Aquat. Org.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The CB hybrid catfish had a similar mortality rate as the USDA 103 channel catfish line when challenged with CCV (Silverstein et al . ). Xu et al .…”

Section: Genetic Approaches To Improve Disease Resistancementioning

confidence: 97%

Disease reduction in aquaculture with genetic and genomic technology: current and future approaches

Elaswad

Dunham

2017

Reviews in Aquaculture

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Reduction in the occurrence and severity of disease in aquaculture would improve the productivity, profitability, efficiency and welfare of aquacultural fish. Genetic approaches that have been successfully implemented in aquaculture to enhance disease resistance and reduce disease incidence include classical selection, genetic marker‐assisted selection, intraspecific crossbreeding, interspecific hybridization and transgenesis. The rate and speed of improvement in disease resistance varies from one genetic enhancement programme to another. Genome editing with zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs), transcription activator‐like effector nucleases (TALENs) and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPRs)‐CRISPR‐associated protein 9 (Cas9) opens avenues for targeted genome modifications. This technology can be applied in aquaculture to manipulate disease‐resistance genes by means of gene knock‐in, gene knockout and regulation of gene expression. The maximum rate of improvement can be achieved by combining different genetic enhancement programmes. Here, we present a review for the current and future prospect of disease reduction in aquaculture with genetic and genomic technologies.

show abstract

Differential susceptibility of blue catfish, Ictalurus furcatus (Valenciennes), channel catfish, I. punctatus (Rafinesque), and blue × channel catfish hybrids to channel catfish virus

Abstract: Differential susceptibility of blue catfish, Ictalurus furcatus (Valenciennes), channel catfish, I. punctatus (Rafinesque), and blue · channel catfish hybrids to channel catfish virus

Cited by 22 publications

References 5 publications

Herpesviruses that Infect Fish

Herpesviruses that Infect Fish

Catfish hybrid Ictalurus punctatus × I. furcatus exhibits higher resistance to columnaris disease than the parental species

Disease reduction in aquaculture with genetic and genomic technology: current and future approaches

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About