1997
DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1997.tb01902.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential Suppression of the Human Mixed Epidermal Cell Lymphocyte Reaction (MECLR) and Mixed Lymphocyte Reaction (MLR) by Cis‐Urocanic Acid

Abstract: Cis-urocanic acid (UCA), formed in the stratum corneum by UV irradiation of trans-UCA has been proposed as a mediator of UV-induced immunosuppression in the skin. In this study, we examined the in vitro effect of cis-UCA (6-100 micrograms/mL) on the human mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) and the mixed epidermal cell lymphocyte reaction (MECLR). Addition of cis-UCA (purified or in a mixture with trans-UCA) did not affect the MLR but was able to induce a 20% suppression of the MECLR responses. Because this effect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These reports are in agreement with the finding that cis-UCA altered vimentin expression among LC, leading to the destruction of their cytoskeleton and reduced APC function (46). Additionally, cis-UCA was able to significantly suppress the mixed epidermal cell lymphocyte reaction, but murine bone marrow-derived dendritic cells exposed to cis-UCA demonstrated only feeble impairment of their allostimulatory capacity (47,48). Although the epidermal cell suspensions we used were enriched for LC, we were not using purified LC.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…These reports are in agreement with the finding that cis-UCA altered vimentin expression among LC, leading to the destruction of their cytoskeleton and reduced APC function (46). Additionally, cis-UCA was able to significantly suppress the mixed epidermal cell lymphocyte reaction, but murine bone marrow-derived dendritic cells exposed to cis-UCA demonstrated only feeble impairment of their allostimulatory capacity (47,48). Although the epidermal cell suspensions we used were enriched for LC, we were not using purified LC.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The lack of a direct effect on antigen-presenting cells was confirmed in a recent study in which cUA had no effect on either the maturation or function of bone marrow-derived dendritic cells in v i~o (157). The cUA suppressed the mixed epidermal-lymphocyte reaction by a maximum of only 27% following 3-6 day preincubation of human epidermal cells with cUA (158). No effect was seen in another study in which human epidermal cells were incubated for 18 h with cUA (159), and cUA had no effect in a mixed lymphocyte reaction (158).…”
Section: Effects Of Ua On the Immune Systemmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The cUA suppressed the mixed epidermal-lymphocyte reaction by a maximum of only 27% following 3-6 day preincubation of human epidermal cells with cUA (158). No effect was seen in another study in which human epidermal cells were incubated for 18 h with cUA (159), and cUA had no effect in a mixed lymphocyte reaction (158). In aggregate, these in vitro studies suggest, but do not prove, that cUA has an indirect, rather than a direct effect on dendritic cells.…”
Section: Effects Of Ua On the Immune Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The immunosuppressive properties of UCA in human subjects have not been studied in vivo but in vitro experiments indicate that cis-UCA can suppress natural killer cell activity (Gilmour et al, 1993), suppress antigen presenting function (Hurks et al, 1997), stimulate PGE 2 production by mononuclear cells (Hart et al, 1993) and keratinocytes (Jaksic et al, 1995), and suppress HLA-DR, IL-1b, IL-2, TNFa, and IL-1b production by mononuclear cells (Rasanen et al, 1989;Hart et al, 1993;Laihia et al, 1994).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%