2004
DOI: 10.1016/s1570-9639(04)00067-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential substrate behaviour of phenol and aniline derivatives during oxidation by horseradish peroxidase: kinetic evidence for a two-step mechanism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1-3 in Chart 1). 15,16) Since the oxidation of rifampicin matches these criteria, we used this model to determine the turnover number (k cat ) for its oxidation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1-3 in Chart 1). 15,16) Since the oxidation of rifampicin matches these criteria, we used this model to determine the turnover number (k cat ) for its oxidation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite early work by Bordeleau et al 1972 indicating a correlation between compound II reactivity and atomic charge on the substrate's phenolic oxygen, Hosoya et al 1983 andSakurada et al 1990 were unable to confirm significant correlation. Job et al 1976, Dunford et al 1986, Sakurada et al 1990, and Gilabert et al 2004 proteins in which the active pocket was opened, and they determined that HRP reactivity (i.e. k cat ) was reasonably correlated (R 2 = 0.81) with predicted binding distances.…”
Section: Kinetics Determining Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The kinetics indicated that a two-step mechanism operated, in which the first step corresponded to the formation of an enzyme-substrate complex, and the second step corresponded to the electron transfer from the substrate to the iron atom. The size and hydrophobicity of the substrates controlled their access to the hydrophobic binding site of HRPC [64][65][66]. In general, the electron donating substituents on the para-site resulted in higher values of reaction rate constants.…”
Section: The Substituent Positionmentioning
confidence: 99%