Differential staining of peripheral nuclear chromatin with Acridine orange implies an A-form epichromatin conformation of the DNA

Abstract

The chromatin observed by conventional electron microscopy under the nuclear envelope constitutes a single layer of dense 30–35 nm granules, while ∼30 nm fibrils laterally attached to them, form large patches of lamin-associated domains (LADs). This particular surface “epichromatin” can be discerned by specific (H2A+H2B+DNA) conformational antibody at the inner nuclear envelope and around mitotic chromosomes. In order to differentiate the DNA conformation of the peripheral chromatin we applied an Acridine orange (AO) DNA structural test involving RNAse treatment and the addition of AO after acid pre-treatment. MCF-7 cells treated in this way revealed yellow/red patches of LADs attached to a thin green nuclear rim and with mitotic chromosomes outlined in green, topologically corresponding to epichromatin epitope staining by immunofluorescence. Differentially from LADs, the epichromatin was unable to provide metachromatic staining by AO, unless thermally denatured at 94oC. DNA enrichment in GC stretches has been recently reported for immunoprecipitated ∼ 1Kb epichromatin domains. Together these data suggest that certain epichromatin segments assume the relatively hydrophobic DNA A-conformation at the nuclear envelope and surface of mitotic chromosomes, preventing AO side dimerisation. We hypothesize that epichromatin domains form nucleosome superbeads. Hydrophobic interactions stack these superbeads and align them at the nuclear envelope, while repulsing the hydrophilic LADs. The hydrophobicity of epichromatin explains its location at the surface of mitotic chromosomes and its function in mediating chromosome attachment to the restituting nuclear envelope during telophase.

Resolution of Complex Issues in Genome Regulation and Cancer Requires Non-Linear and Network-Based Thermodynamics

“…Similarly, the preferential way of the chromatin networking might be determined by the anisotropic (symmetry breaking) super-packaging of heterochromatin [54], with its aggregation-stimulating capacity to impinge 'a sticky silence' on the large genome domains [15,55]. The non-coding RNA that is transcribed from heterochromatin [56] can also electrostatically contribute to its packaging [25,57]. The spatial compartmentalization of the nucleus is maintained by relatively simple basic physicochemical principles, including electrostatic and hydrophobic forces that generate an extremely detailed 'nuclear topology' giving a material basis to robust gene expression regulation, as indicated by Ronald Hancock [58].…”

Apicomplexa and Histone Variants: What’s New?

“…Epichromatin is a conformational epitope formed by DNA and histones H2A and H2B localized only at the exterior chromatin surface [17,18]. More recently, it was observed that epichromatin forms superbead domains associated to DNA-A at the nuclear envelope [19]. A 3D analysis also shows that P. falciparum nucleus presents a polarization of the nuclear pore complex: in the early multinucleated schizont, it clusters in the nucleus region facing the mother plasma membrane, whereas in the late stages, when prepared for budding, it clusters toward the cytoplasm of the incipient merozoite [20].…”

Curcumin‐induced autophagy and nucleophagy in Spodoptera frugiperda Sf9 insect cells occur via PI3K/AKT/TOR pathways

“…ELCS can participate in the chromatin autophagy. 16,57,58 A vacuole behind (red arrow) is an autolysosome, lying in the region of centrosome in the emanating microtubules (MT) ( Figure 11A and 11B). Similar to our result, recently, nucleolar aggresomes mediate release of pericentric heterochromatin and nuclear destruction of genotoxically treated cancer cells was reported, and teratocarcinoma PA1 cells treated with etoposide, focusing on the nucleolus most cells display persistent DNA damage and activate macroautophagy.…”