2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10336-016-1347-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential spatial use and spatial fidelity by breeders in Bonelli’s Eagle (Aquila fasciata)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…html). Home ranges of 50% kernel-density represent nesting and coreareas, 75% the actively selected areas for hunting or roosting (Martinez-Miranzo et al 2016) and 90% is an estimate of total home range (Trierweiler 2010;Guixé and Arroyo 2011). Home ranges were not calculated for flight segments (linear movement between distant sites).…”
Section: Home Range Size and Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…html). Home ranges of 50% kernel-density represent nesting and coreareas, 75% the actively selected areas for hunting or roosting (Martinez-Miranzo et al 2016) and 90% is an estimate of total home range (Trierweiler 2010;Guixé and Arroyo 2011). Home ranges were not calculated for flight segments (linear movement between distant sites).…”
Section: Home Range Size and Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, males could adapt their copulation frequencies to both their own movements and those of their mates [40, 44]. In our study, Bonelli´s Eagles spent 66% of each day ranging over their foraging areas; although information on foraging movements as a pair during the pre-laying period are currently scarce [24, 52, 53, 54]. However, recent high-resolution satellite telemetry monitoring revealed that both sexes spend a large part of each day ranging together over their foraging areas during the period preceding egg-laying (Perona & López-López pers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By comparing the level of overlap or similarity of UDs at different time-points it is possible to determine how the level of consistency of space-use, or site fidelity, of an animal may change over time [1921]. Assuming two different discrete UDs that have both been rescaled as probability distributions, the Bhatacharyya coefficient (or Bhattacharyya's affinity) is a simple way to compare the level of similarity or overlap of the UDs [59,64,65]: where q represents each discrete cell in the spatial grid and is the probability mass for that cell at time t i .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a limited home range, an animal may repeatedly visit certain locations [18] or actively spend more time in specific areas leading to different levels of space-use intensity. For an individual animal, the level of similarity in its space use at different time points can be calculated and the level of site fidelity quantified [1922]. In the specific context of pasture-based cattle, [23] showed how spatial overlap between domesticated cattle and wild buffalo was linked to the gradient of available resources, [24] demonstrated how concentrate supplement can modify the feeding behaviour of grazing cows in high mountain pastures, while [25] considered how spatial interactions between cattle and wild boar could potentially facilitate cross-species disease transmission.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%