2009
DOI: 10.1029/2009wr007721
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential soil respiration responses to changing hydrologic regimes

Abstract: [1] Soil respiration is tightly coupled to the hydrologic cycle (i.e., snowmelt and precipitation timing and magnitude). We examined riparian and hillslope soil respiration across a wet (2005) and a dry (2006) growing season in a subalpine catchment. When comparing the riparian zones, cumulative CO 2 efflux was 33% higher, and peak efflux occurred 17 days earlier during the dry growing season. In contrast, cumulative efflux in the hillslopes was 8% lower, and peak efflux occurred 10 days earlier during the dri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
28
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(47 reference statements)
3
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Soil pH ranged from 4.22 to 5.64 in HUZ sites, from 5.63 to 6.86 in LUZ sites, and from 5.41 to 6.30 in RZ sites. Soil CO 2 and CH 4 concentrations and surface CO 2 efflux were consistently higher in RZ sites than in LUZ and HUZ sites (see Table S1), in agreement with previous reports on CO 2 from this site (23,24,26,31).…”
Section: Soil Environmental Measurementssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Soil pH ranged from 4.22 to 5.64 in HUZ sites, from 5.63 to 6.86 in LUZ sites, and from 5.41 to 6.30 in RZ sites. Soil CO 2 and CH 4 concentrations and surface CO 2 efflux were consistently higher in RZ sites than in LUZ and HUZ sites (see Table S1), in agreement with previous reports on CO 2 from this site (23,24,26,31).…”
Section: Soil Environmental Measurementssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Surprisingly, there is little information regarding the soil microbial communities involved. This experimental forest has been studied extensively in efforts to quantify soil CO 2 production and surface efflux as a function of hydrology at the landscape scale (23,24,26,31,32,49,50). The current study aimed to continue these landscape-scale efforts by assessing potential linkages between different soil environments within this watershed and the microbial drivers of greenhouse gas exchanges.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Soil CO 2 efflux is most commonly modelled as a function of temperature and moisture (Kang et al 2003(Kang et al , 2006Tang and Baldocchi 2005;Sjögersten et al 2006;Pacific et al 2009). In this study, we found agreement that temperature and moisture were important drivers of CO 2 efflux.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The majority of models developed to predict forest soil CO 2 efflux are fairly simple, accounting for temperature and soil moisture based on their abilities to control the rates of biological reactions in soil microbes (e.g., Kang et al 2003Kang et al , 2006Tang and Baldocchi 2005;Sjögersten et al 2006;Pacific et al 2009;Barron-Gafford et al 2011;Cable et al 2012;Chang et al 2014). Temperature is usually the strongest predictor of soil CO 2 efflux, because temperature directly controls microbial activity and rates of respiration (Davidson et al 1998.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%