Abstract:Soybean rust, caused by the fungus Phakopsora pachyrhizi, was detected in the continental United States in 2004. Several new sources of resistance to P. pachyrhizi have been identified in soybean (Glycine max); however, there is limited information about their resistance when challenged with additional U.S. and international isolates. Resistance of 20 soybean (G. max) entries was compared after inoculation with 10 P. pachyrhizi isolates, representing different geographic and temporal origins. Soybean entries i… Show more
“…In contrast, the P. pachyrhizi isolates collected in Alabama in 2004 induced a susceptible reaction in Rpp1-carrying PI 200492. Pham et al (2009) confirmed that the rust isolates resulting in a susceptible reaction in PI 200492 already existed in Brazil by 2001. These findings suggest that initial entry of the pathogen was achieved by its long distance movement from Central or South America (Isard et al 2005, Pan et al 2006.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The US isolates expressing the same pathogenicity profile as US isolates collected in 2004 when soybean rust was first found in the US (Schneider et al 2005), have not been detected in subsequent US samples (Paul et al 2015, Paul & Hartman 2009, Pham et al 2009). Therefore, it has been suggested that P. pachyrhizi isolates existing in 2004 disappeared or were suppressed due to the subsequent winter, likely resulting in unfavorable conditions for pathogen survival a resistant reaction in response to 5%-53% of the rust populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Yorinori (2008) Brazil, and Paraguay (Akamatsu et al 2013). Similarly, a P. pachyrhizi isolate from Taiwan collected in 1972 produced a resistant reaction in an Rpp2-carrying PI, and an isolate collected in 1980 caused a susceptible reaction in the same PI (Bonde et al 2006, Pham et al 2009). Bonde et al (2006) reported that P. pachyrhizi isolates collected in South America, Africa, and Thailand in 2001 were more virulent and/or aggressive than older isolates collected from 1972 to 1994.…”
Soybean rust caused by Phakopsora pachyrhizi is one of the most serious economic threats to soybean production in South America. A previous study using South American P. pachyrhizi populations collected between 2007/2008 and 2009/2010 revealed the pathogenic diversity in Argentinean, Brazilian, and Paraguayan rust populations. Because such pathogenic diversity has been a major constraint to the breeding program for soybean rust resistance, pathogen populations were continuously monitored throughout the 2010/2011 to 2014/2015 seasons using the same method of evaluating pathogenicity as used in the previous study. None of the 83 P. pachyrhizi samples collected from the three countries from 2010/2011 to 2014/2015 yielded identical pathogenicity patterns in the 16 differentials, thus demonstrating the pathogenic diversity of more recent South American rust populations. Cluster analysis using a total of 145 rust populations from 2007 to 2015 demonstrated that the Argentinean, Brazilian, and Paraguayan populations were not assigned to three distinct country-based groups. The analysis indicated that a majority of South American populations differed in pathogenicity compared with Japanese rust races. The rates of resistance to the rust populations varied among the 13 differentials carrying Rpp genes; the most effective resistance gene was Rpp1-b followed by Rpp5, and the least effective was Rpp1.
“…In contrast, the P. pachyrhizi isolates collected in Alabama in 2004 induced a susceptible reaction in Rpp1-carrying PI 200492. Pham et al (2009) confirmed that the rust isolates resulting in a susceptible reaction in PI 200492 already existed in Brazil by 2001. These findings suggest that initial entry of the pathogen was achieved by its long distance movement from Central or South America (Isard et al 2005, Pan et al 2006.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The US isolates expressing the same pathogenicity profile as US isolates collected in 2004 when soybean rust was first found in the US (Schneider et al 2005), have not been detected in subsequent US samples (Paul et al 2015, Paul & Hartman 2009, Pham et al 2009). Therefore, it has been suggested that P. pachyrhizi isolates existing in 2004 disappeared or were suppressed due to the subsequent winter, likely resulting in unfavorable conditions for pathogen survival a resistant reaction in response to 5%-53% of the rust populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Yorinori (2008) Brazil, and Paraguay (Akamatsu et al 2013). Similarly, a P. pachyrhizi isolate from Taiwan collected in 1972 produced a resistant reaction in an Rpp2-carrying PI, and an isolate collected in 1980 caused a susceptible reaction in the same PI (Bonde et al 2006, Pham et al 2009). Bonde et al (2006) reported that P. pachyrhizi isolates collected in South America, Africa, and Thailand in 2001 were more virulent and/or aggressive than older isolates collected from 1972 to 1994.…”
Soybean rust caused by Phakopsora pachyrhizi is one of the most serious economic threats to soybean production in South America. A previous study using South American P. pachyrhizi populations collected between 2007/2008 and 2009/2010 revealed the pathogenic diversity in Argentinean, Brazilian, and Paraguayan rust populations. Because such pathogenic diversity has been a major constraint to the breeding program for soybean rust resistance, pathogen populations were continuously monitored throughout the 2010/2011 to 2014/2015 seasons using the same method of evaluating pathogenicity as used in the previous study. None of the 83 P. pachyrhizi samples collected from the three countries from 2010/2011 to 2014/2015 yielded identical pathogenicity patterns in the 16 differentials, thus demonstrating the pathogenic diversity of more recent South American rust populations. Cluster analysis using a total of 145 rust populations from 2007 to 2015 demonstrated that the Argentinean, Brazilian, and Paraguayan populations were not assigned to three distinct country-based groups. The analysis indicated that a majority of South American populations differed in pathogenicity compared with Japanese rust races. The rates of resistance to the rust populations varied among the 13 differentials carrying Rpp genes; the most effective resistance gene was Rpp1-b followed by Rpp5, and the least effective was Rpp1.
“…These resistance genes have been identified genetically but not yet cloned. Screening for resistance against P. pachyrhizi is generally done using three different infection phenotypes: the highest degree of protection was observed in the so-called "immune" response where no disease symptoms were found on soybean leaves upon inoculation with the pathogen (Bromfield, 1984;Pham et al, 2009). By contrast, susceptible interactions are characterized by tan-colored lesions, referred to as "TAN"-type, in which 2-5 uredia (syn.…”
Section: Breeding For Disease Resistance and Other Disease Managementmentioning
“…These genes are not effective against all populations of P. pachyrhizi [22]. The transfer of resistance genes through classical breeding or through marker-assisted selection allow to develop resistant varieties and their use as an efficient and costeffective method for soybean rust control.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.