2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2011.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential resistance of insect sodium channels with kdr mutations to deltamethrin, permethrin and DDT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
73
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
73
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…gambiae), a significant additive benefit of 1575Y was detectable. 1014F and 1014S, although not directly in the binding pocket, are thought to produce their resistance phenotype through altering the confirmation of the VGSC, preventing binding of insecticide (9,24). By contrast, N1575Y occurs within the linker between domains III and IV, the site of the inactivation particle, a sequence of three amino acids (MFM in mammals and IFM in insects), which closes the sodium channel pore following activation, stopping influx of sodium ions into the cell so permitting restoration of the membrane resting potential.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…gambiae), a significant additive benefit of 1575Y was detectable. 1014F and 1014S, although not directly in the binding pocket, are thought to produce their resistance phenotype through altering the confirmation of the VGSC, preventing binding of insecticide (9,24). By contrast, N1575Y occurs within the linker between domains III and IV, the site of the inactivation particle, a sequence of three amino acids (MFM in mammals and IFM in insects), which closes the sodium channel pore following activation, stopping influx of sodium ions into the cell so permitting restoration of the membrane resting potential.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 and 28). Such electrophysiological studies have not only demonstrated the impact of 1014F and 1014S on neuronal response in the presence of insecticide but, additionally, indicated that, in the absence of insecticide, knockdown resistance mutations may exhibit different response profiles in comparison with wild-type alleles (24), which may manifest as a slight fitness detriment. In resistant bacteria, the costs of antibiotic resistance in the absence of selection pressure are known to be ameliorated by compensatory mutations co-occurring in the antibiotic target site (29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we also examined two mutations, leucine (L) to phenylalanine (F) or serine (S) mutation at amino acid position 1021 (L1021F/S) in domain II segment 6 (IIS6) because they were found in pyrethroid-resistant Anopheles and Culex mosquitoes (12). The L1021F mutation corresponds to L1014F in the house fly sodium channel and L993F in the cockroach sodium channel, both of which have previously been shown to reduce the sensitivity of respective sodium channels to pyrethroids (12,14), whereas the L1021S mutation reduces the sensitivity of a Drosophila sodium channel to pyrethroids (32). Because S996P and D1794Y mutations are often found to coexist with V1023G in pyrethroid-resistant field populations of Ae.…”
Section: Five Mutations Confer the Aana V 1-1 Channel Resistance To Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed previously, this is at least in part because while there are hundreds of different pesticides in use, they have a relatively small set of related molecular targets (Casida, 2009). For example, insects can develop cross‐resistance to DDT and pyrethroids because both of those classes of chemicals commonly inhibit voltage‐gated sodium channels in the central nervous system (e.g., Burton et al., 2011). Shared features of the chemical tolerance phenotype of the multiple tolerant killifish populations are analogous.…”
Section: Ecological Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%