2005
DOI: 10.1080/09585200500284203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential reporting in Germany – A historical analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
46
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
46
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, all companies are now allowed to publish single accounts according to IFRS in the German Federal Gazette. However, the German Commercial Code remains mandatory for the preparation of all companies' single accounts (two-level system), since single accounts still prevail as basis for the calculation of the distributable income (Eierle 2005). For a summary of the accounting requirements in the German welfare-state see Table 2.…”
Section: Accounting Requirements In the German Welfare-statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, all companies are now allowed to publish single accounts according to IFRS in the German Federal Gazette. However, the German Commercial Code remains mandatory for the preparation of all companies' single accounts (two-level system), since single accounts still prevail as basis for the calculation of the distributable income (Eierle 2005). For a summary of the accounting requirements in the German welfare-state see Table 2.…”
Section: Accounting Requirements In the German Welfare-statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This framework followed a micro-economic perspective of regulation and was geared towards the regulation of the relations between the company and its constituencies (Eierle 2005). In general, the applied accounting rules were based on the principle of prudence (i.e., conservative valuation) and single accounts were used to calculate the distributable income.…”
Section: Accounting Requirements In the German Welfare-statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The debate in the literature has focused on the production of financial reports to satisfy the external users of the financial information (Williams & Tower, 1998;Holmes, Kent & Downey, 1991;Eierle 2005). Underpining the debate is the premise that shareholders and financial institutions require the same level of protection when dealing with Small Medium Enterprise (SME) companies as they do for the larger companies, especially publicly listed companies (Knutson & Wichmann, 1984;Brailsford & Ramsay, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%