2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2018.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential regulation of tefluthrin and telmisartan on the gating charges of INa activation and inactivation as well as on resurgent and persistent INa in a pituitary cell line (GH3)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
57
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
8
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this reason, we next evaluated whether, in the presence of these I Na activators, further application of NAL is still effective at suppressing I Na in these cells. The peak amplitude of I Na was enhanced in combination with a considerable slowing in the inactivation time course of the current, as reported previously (So et al, ; Wu et al, ). It should be noted, as shown in Figure A, that in continued presence of Tef or metofluthrin, subsequent application of NAL suppressed the peak I Na ; however, it further slowed in the inactivation time course of I Na .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For this reason, we next evaluated whether, in the presence of these I Na activators, further application of NAL is still effective at suppressing I Na in these cells. The peak amplitude of I Na was enhanced in combination with a considerable slowing in the inactivation time course of the current, as reported previously (So et al, ; Wu et al, ). It should be noted, as shown in Figure A, that in continued presence of Tef or metofluthrin, subsequent application of NAL suppressed the peak I Na ; however, it further slowed in the inactivation time course of I Na .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The present results also suggested that NAL suppressed peak I Na in a voltage‐dependent fashion, inasmuch as the steady‐state inactivation curve of peak I Na taken after addition of NAL shifted toward a hyperpolarized potential, despite no clear modification of the gating charge of the curve. Meanwhile, consistent with previous observations (He & Soderlund, ; So et al, ; Wu et al, ), as mHippE‐14 neurons were exposed to Tef (10 μM), the amplitude of I Na was enhanced in combination with an increase in the I Na ‐τ inact(S) value. Further addition of NAL remained efficacious in reversing Tef‐mediated stimulation of peak I Na although it increased τ inact(S) further.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Resurgent currents appear when neurons are repolarized after prolonged depolarization. They are reported to promote spontaneous firing and high‐frequency firing of inhibitory neurons and may be a promising antiepileptic therapeutic target . A computer model that includes the unique activation features of resurgent currents is still to be developed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Telmisartan has been reported to suppress hK V 1.5 and human erg (HERG) K + channels expressed in Xenopus oocytes . Recent evidence also suggests the ability of TEL to retard I Na inactivation in rat cardiomyocytes …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Telmisartan (TEL; C33H30N4O2; 4′-[(1,4′-dimethyl-2′-propyl[ 2 ,6′-bi-1H-benzimidazol]-1′-yl)-1′-yl]methyl)-[1,1′-biphenyl]-2carboxylic acid), a non-peptide, orally active blocker of angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor, is the newest available drug class for the treatment of hypertension and different types of cardiovascular disorders. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] This drug has been demonstrated to exert anti-inflammatory actions that are closely linked to its activation of PPARγ activity. [10][11][12][13] However, growing evidence indicates that TEL may interact with ion channels to perturb the amplitude and kinetics of ion currents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%