2006
DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209751
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential regulation of CXC ligand 1 transcription in melanoma cell lines by poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1

Abstract: The continuous production of the CXC ligand 1 (CXCL1) chemokine by melanoma cells is a major effector of tumor growth. We have previously shown that the constitutive expression of this chemokine is dependent upon transcription factors nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-jB), stimulating protein-1 (SP1), high-mobility group-I/Y (HMGI/Y), CAAT displacement protein (CDP) and poly(ADPribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1). In this study, we demonstrate for the first time the mechanism of transcriptional regulation of CXCL1 through … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results suggest that catalytic activity of Parp-1 is important at the Bcl-6 locus, and therefore, a coactivator role (Hassa et al, 2001) is not likely. Others have demonstrated a dual effect at some promoters whereby Parp-1 inhibition represses expression and Parp-1 knockdown has the opposite effect (Amiri et al, 2006;Soldatenkov et al, 2002). The proposed mechanism for this is that Parp-1 binding represses transcription but activation of Parp-1 followed by auto poly-(ADP-ribosylation) and dissociation from DNA leads to induction of transcription.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results suggest that catalytic activity of Parp-1 is important at the Bcl-6 locus, and therefore, a coactivator role (Hassa et al, 2001) is not likely. Others have demonstrated a dual effect at some promoters whereby Parp-1 inhibition represses expression and Parp-1 knockdown has the opposite effect (Amiri et al, 2006;Soldatenkov et al, 2002). The proposed mechanism for this is that Parp-1 binding represses transcription but activation of Parp-1 followed by auto poly-(ADP-ribosylation) and dissociation from DNA leads to induction of transcription.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can contact DNA directly either by specific sequence recognition (Zhang et al, 2002;Huang et al, 2004;Amiri et al, 2006) or possibly by binding to secondary hairpin structures (Lonskaya et al, 2005;Potaman et al, 2005). In some transcription factor complexes, Parp-1 has a coactivator role and associates with other proteins in a manner that Reduction in PARP activity produces an increase in Bcl-6 transcription.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NF-B was found to be one of the major regulators for GRO1 expression (37,38). The proximal GRO1 promoter was found to contain an NF-B binding site along with a TATA box and an immediate upstream region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1, in its inactive state, attaches to specific sequences in the C-X-C-motif chemokine ligand 1 promoter and prevents NF-B (p65/p50) binding and transcription activation. 87 In stress conditions, PARP-1 activation and PAR modification resulted in a loss of its binding to the CXC ligand 1 promoter, thus allowing NF-B binding and enhanced CXC ligand 1 expression. 87 Others 88 showed that PARP-1 binding to the iNOS promoter enhances NO production, and s-nitrosylation of PARP-1 by NO negatively regulated the PARP-1 transactivation of the iNOS gene, likely by altering its binding and/or action at the iNOS promoter.…”
Section: Role Of Parp-1 In Inflammatory Gene Expressionmentioning
confidence: 99%