1986
DOI: 10.1007/bf00021856
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential reaction of wheat cultivars to hot environments

Abstract: Ten to 20 spring wheat (Triticum uestivum L.) cultivars of Israeli origin were grown in three winter (normal) and two summer (abnormal) growing seasons. During the period of emergence to anthesis mean daily temperature was on the average 12°C higher and photoperiod was about 3 h longer in the summer than in the winter. Data was collected on the durations of the periods from emergence to double-ridge (GSI), double ridge to anthesis (GS2) and anthesis to grain maturation (GS3), as well as on yield and yield comp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
41
0
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(22 reference statements)
9
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Heat stress tolerance was evaluated by comparing the grain yield and TKW from normal plots (normal planting, disease protected) with that of heat-stressed plots (late planting, disease protected) (Shpiler and Blum, 1986). Similarly, tolerance to spot blotch was evaluated by comparing the grain yield and TKW from normal plots (fungicide protected, timely planted) with that of spot blotch-stressed plots (without fungicide protection, normal planting).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Heat stress tolerance was evaluated by comparing the grain yield and TKW from normal plots (normal planting, disease protected) with that of heat-stressed plots (late planting, disease protected) (Shpiler and Blum, 1986). Similarly, tolerance to spot blotch was evaluated by comparing the grain yield and TKW from normal plots (fungicide protected, timely planted) with that of spot blotch-stressed plots (without fungicide protection, normal planting).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kernel number was unaffected, in contrast to observations made in previous controlled environment studies (Gibson and Paulsen, 1999;Khanna-Chopra and Viswanathan, 1999). This difference could be attributed to the growth stage at which heat stress was present (Shpiler and Blum, 1986). U. R. ROSYARA et al Heat stress during GS3 (anthesis to maturity) mainly affects assimilate availability, the translocation of photosynthates to the grain, and starch synthesis and deposition in the developing grain.…”
Section: Spot Blotch and Heat Tolerance In Spring Wheatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, for breeding purposes, the resistance to various stresses may be combined and may create opportunities for better yielding wheat varieties. 14,15 Plant response to stress is a complex phenomenon and wheat has a moderate tolerance to salinity. [14][15][16] In the present study we selected modal weight as the seeds to be used for precisely studying the effect of stress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14,15 Plant response to stress is a complex phenomenon and wheat has a moderate tolerance to salinity. [14][15][16] In the present study we selected modal weight as the seeds to be used for precisely studying the effect of stress. Seed germination is said to occur due to the water intake by the seed but it is also said to decrease due to the salt.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, at a cellular level, although about 80% of cellular enlargement occurs between the end of cellular division and the conclusion of dry matter accumulation (Nicolas et al, 1984), the rate of cellular volumetric augmentation does not compensate the decreasing extent of cellular enlargement (Stone et al, 1995. Caley et al (1990 and Jenner (1994) further confirmed these data, and Shpiler and Blum (1986), working with field trials, also reported that grain maturity develops earlier, producing smaller and shriveled grains, in heat stressed genotypes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%