1984
DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(84)90507-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential radioprotection of normal tissues by hydrophilic chemical protectors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other antioxidants such as the thioredoxin and peroxyredoxin reductases also rely on access to abundant thiols, via the amino acid cysteine and glutathione. Although radiation protection by cysteine/thiol supplementation has been recognized since biological studies of radiation exposure were initiated [19, 20], the development of protectants for normal cells and/or specific tumor sensitizers has been stymied by the inability to separately effect tumor versus surrounding normal tissues (review: [4]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other antioxidants such as the thioredoxin and peroxyredoxin reductases also rely on access to abundant thiols, via the amino acid cysteine and glutathione. Although radiation protection by cysteine/thiol supplementation has been recognized since biological studies of radiation exposure were initiated [19, 20], the development of protectants for normal cells and/or specific tumor sensitizers has been stymied by the inability to separately effect tumor versus surrounding normal tissues (review: [4]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In tumors, the uptake is predominantly through passive diffusion, which is slow due to the hydrophilicity of the compound.13 This is in contrast to the dephosphorylated form of the compound, WR-1065, which is less hydrophilic and readily crosses the tumor cell membrane. In fact, Brown et al 14 suggested that the hydrophilicity of the compound could be useful for designing or selecting better differential radioprotectors. This is supported by their work that showed increases in the therapeutic gain (ratio of the dose reduction factors for the hematopoietic system and tumor) for 6 hydrophilic thiols, ranging from 1.59-2.29, in comparison to values ranging from 0.88-1.59 for 5 lipophilic thiols.…”
Section: Cell Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%