2006
DOI: 10.1086/504115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential Radial Velocities and Stellar Parameters of Nearby Young Stars

Abstract: ABSTRACT. Radial velocity searches for substellar-mass companions have focused primarily on stars older than 1 Gyr. Increased levels of stellar activity in young stars hinders the detection of solar system analogs, and therefore until recently there has been a prejudice against inclusion of young stars in radial velocity surveys. Adaptive optics surveys of young stars have given us insight into the multiplicity of young stars, but only for massive, distant companions. Understanding the limit of the radial velo… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
46
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
6
46
3
Order By: Relevance
“…later than those of our targets, and their detection limit estimation is probably conservative (like our rmsbased method). Our detection limits, even before correcting for activity, are better than those obtained by Paulson & Yelda (2006) on the β Pic moving group; for these targets, their detection limits at short periods fall in the brown dwarf regime, whereas our limits are well within the planet regime for similar periods. We attribute this to the internal precision of their measurements, their adopted observing strategy, and their approach to estimating the detection limits.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Surveyscontrasting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…later than those of our targets, and their detection limit estimation is probably conservative (like our rmsbased method). Our detection limits, even before correcting for activity, are better than those obtained by Paulson & Yelda (2006) on the β Pic moving group; for these targets, their detection limits at short periods fall in the brown dwarf regime, whereas our limits are well within the planet regime for similar periods. We attribute this to the internal precision of their measurements, their adopted observing strategy, and their approach to estimating the detection limits.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Surveyscontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…To our knowledge, the only significant surveys have been performed by Paulson et al (2004) on 94 stars members of the Hyades (aged about 600 Myr) and on 61 stars members of various moving groups (MGs) or stellar associations aged between 12 and 300 Myr (Paulson & Yelda 2006). In both cases, high spectral resolution data in the range 40 000-70 000 were used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Six others were already followed either at optical or NIR wavelengths, albeit at a 50 m s −1 precision (AGTri, ATMicA, ATMicB, auMic, BD+012447, V1005Ori; Paulson & Yelda 2006;Bailey et al 2012), and three targets benefited from a precise RV follow-up at optical wavelengths (BD+201790,εEridani, GJ3305AB; e.g., Campbell et al 1988;Figueira et al 2010;Elliott et al 2014;Hernán-Obispo et al 2015).…”
Section: The Young Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although bisector analysis may sometimes lead to the confirmation of a planet orbiting a star even when RV jitter is present (Sozzetti et al 2006;Setiawan et al 2007Setiawan et al , 2008, the latter technique is not always successful (Huélamo et al 2008;Figueira et al 2010). Several authors have studied the impact of activity on RV jitter using R HK as a proxy (Saar et al 1998;Santos et al 2000;Paulson et al 2002;Saar et al 2003;Wright 2005;Paulson & Yelda 2006;Santos et al 2010). In particular, Saar et al (1998) and Santos et al (2000) compiled empirical relationships between σ rv and R HK for stars in the Lick v r survey and the Geneva extrasolar planet search programme.…”
Section: Predicted Radial Velocity Jittermentioning
confidence: 99%