Abstract:PurposeThe main objective of this study is to compare the protein expression of human keratocytes treated with Plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF) or autologous serum (AS) and previously induced to myofibroblast by TGF-β1 treatment.MethodsBlood from healthy donor was collected and processed to obtain AS and PRGF eye drops. Blood derivates were aliquoted and stored at -80°C until use. Keratocyte cells were pretreated for 60 minutes with 2.5 ng/ml TGF-β1. After that, cells were treated with PRGF, AS or with TGF… Show more
“…Finally, a recent study showed that PRGF eye drops were able to produce a significant reduction in the number of transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1-induced myofibroblasts in comparison to AS, suggesting that PRGF may promote corneal wound healing regeneration, reducing scar formation [15]. To understand the pathways by which PRGF exerts its antifibrotic potential in comparison to AS, a proteomic study was performed in HK cells differentiated to myofibroblasts, which previously were to be treated with PRGF or AS [23]. This study shows that PRGF treatment inactivated or reduced the activation of several proteins involved in the pathways, whereby TGF-β1 exerts its action to induce the formation of α-actin fibers on human corneal stromal keratocytes (HK), inducing their transformation to myofibroblasts.…”
Over the last three decades, there has been special interest in developing drugs that mimic the characteristics of natural tears for use it in the treatment of several ocular surface disorders. Interestingly, the composition of blood plasma is very similar to tears. Therefore, different blood-derived products like autologous serum (AS) and plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF) have been developed for the treatment of diverse ocular pathologies. However, scarce studies have been carried out to analyze the differences between both types of blood-derived products. In the present study, blood from three healthy donors was drawn and processed to obtain AS and PRGF eye drops. Then, human corneal stromal keratocytes (HK) were treated with PRGF or undiluted AS. Proteomic analysis was carried out to analyze and characterize the differential protein profiles between PRGF and AS, and the differentially expressed proteins in HK cells after PRGF and AS treatment. The results obtained in the present study show that undiluted AS induces the activation of different pathways related to an inflammatory, angiogenic, oxidative stress and scarring response in HK cells regarding PRGF. These results suggest that PRGF could be a better alternative than AS for the treatment of ocular surface disorders.
“…Finally, a recent study showed that PRGF eye drops were able to produce a significant reduction in the number of transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1-induced myofibroblasts in comparison to AS, suggesting that PRGF may promote corneal wound healing regeneration, reducing scar formation [15]. To understand the pathways by which PRGF exerts its antifibrotic potential in comparison to AS, a proteomic study was performed in HK cells differentiated to myofibroblasts, which previously were to be treated with PRGF or AS [23]. This study shows that PRGF treatment inactivated or reduced the activation of several proteins involved in the pathways, whereby TGF-β1 exerts its action to induce the formation of α-actin fibers on human corneal stromal keratocytes (HK), inducing their transformation to myofibroblasts.…”
Over the last three decades, there has been special interest in developing drugs that mimic the characteristics of natural tears for use it in the treatment of several ocular surface disorders. Interestingly, the composition of blood plasma is very similar to tears. Therefore, different blood-derived products like autologous serum (AS) and plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF) have been developed for the treatment of diverse ocular pathologies. However, scarce studies have been carried out to analyze the differences between both types of blood-derived products. In the present study, blood from three healthy donors was drawn and processed to obtain AS and PRGF eye drops. Then, human corneal stromal keratocytes (HK) were treated with PRGF or undiluted AS. Proteomic analysis was carried out to analyze and characterize the differential protein profiles between PRGF and AS, and the differentially expressed proteins in HK cells after PRGF and AS treatment. The results obtained in the present study show that undiluted AS induces the activation of different pathways related to an inflammatory, angiogenic, oxidative stress and scarring response in HK cells regarding PRGF. These results suggest that PRGF could be a better alternative than AS for the treatment of ocular surface disorders.
“…Indeed, the different PRGF-based formulations including injectable liquid, eye drops, clot and membrane (for outpatient treatment and surgical use) exert regenerative, anti-inflammatory, antifibrotic, anti-bacterial, proliferative and cell migration properties. [14][15][16] Therefore, CC therapy should be focused on regeneration and on avoiding inflammation and fibrosis before reaching the risk of corneal blindness or other ocular surface complications. In this particular study, and intending to avoid the potential risk of certain side effects related to the PRGF's IgE levels and complement activity in autoimmune diseases or other refractory cases to the treatment, we decided to apply Immunosafe PRGF formulations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The protocol for the preparation of Endoret-PRGF eye drops (ePRGF) is described in the kit's instructions for use, and it has been published by Anitua and Col. 15,16,20 The procedure was carried out under sterile conditions in the surgical room. To prepare the ePRGF, 70 mL of peripheral blood was collected into 9 mL tubes with 3.8% sodium citrate as an anticoagulant.…”
Section: Preparation and Use Of Immunosafe Prgfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 PRGF also increases the proliferation and migration activity of corneal keratocytes and conjunctival fibroblasts, reducing the TGFβ-1 activity, leading to a tissue regeneration approach that limits the fibrosis pathways. [14][15][16] It has been reported that immunosafe PRGF (isPRGF) treatment, which implies a 1-hour extra heat treatment at 56º C, preserves the content of most of the proteins and morphogens involved in the wound healing process while reduces the content of IgE and complement activity drastically. 20 In diseases related to an immune system unbalance, and an acute inflammatory response such as Sjögren Syndrome and GVHD, the effect of isPRGF has been evaluated with satisfactory results.…”
The objective was to evaluate the clinical results obtained from the use of immunosafe plasma rich in growth factors (isPRGF) in the treatment of patients with cicatrizing conjunctivitis (CC) who had not responded to the usual therapy. Patients and Methods: This is a retrospective study that included patients diagnosed with CC, in whom isPRGF was used in different phases (I: eye drops; II: eye drops and injectable; III: eye drops, injectable and surgical treatment) to achieve control of the inflammation. As a clinical follow-up of the patients, the better corrected visual acuity (BCVA), degree of inflammation (measured from 1 to 4), the severity of the CC, Schirmer I test, IOP and TBUT were analyzed. The adverse events were also evaluated. Results: Ten eyes (6 patients) were evaluated, 50% corresponded to Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and 50% to ocular mucous membrane pemphigoid. The mean age was 59.7 ± 16.5 (39-80) years, and 50% were women. Fifty per cent of the cases were initially considered severe CC, and 10% of the cases (one eye of one patient) were considered severe CC at the end of the treatment (p = 0.046). The initial degree of inflammation was 2 in 4 eyes, 3 in two eyes, and 4 in 4 eyes, and final inflammation degree was 1 in all cases (p = 0.004). Twenty per cent of the cases achieved stability in Phase I of the treatment with immunosafe PRGF, 70% with both Phases I and II, and only one case underwent Phase III to achieve stability. The IOP improved significantly (p = 0.027) though the BCVA, TBUT and Schirmer I test showed no significant changes. The follow-up time was 23.1 ± 6.7 (13.6-30.3) months. No adverse effects were reported. Conclusion: Treatment with PRGF technology in its injectable and topical immunosafe formulations may be a novel alternative for the treatment of patients with CC, given its complement activity modulating effect, as well as its anti-inflammatory, antifibrotic and regenerative properties.
“…El PRP es un hemoderivado con alta concentración de plaquetas, que puede servir para regeneración celular y activación biológica de diversos sistemas para responder a procesos traumáticos, degenerativos o infecciosos. Los factores de coagulación y citocinas están almacenados principalmente dentro de los gránulos alfa (Castro-Piedra & Arias-Varela, 2019), que son los responsables de inducir diferentes respuestas biológicas en la hemostasias y regeneración, constituyendo también el plasma rico en factores de crecimiento (PRFC) (Alcazar-Rubio et al, 2015;Anitua et al, 2018) (Tabla 1). La capacidad de cicatrización, regeneración y defensa está modulada por las células mesenquimales como células madre que dan origen a la mayoría de las células (Hersant et al, 2019).…”
En las últimas décadas, la terapia de plasma rico en plaquetas (PRP) ha despertado mucha atención en el área de la medicina regenerativa, siendo aplicada a diferentes patologías sistémicas y localizadas. El PRP proporciona diversos factores de crecimiento y proteínas que pueden estimular al proceso de regeneración celular, representa un factor importante para su uso clínico generalizado, en diferentes tejidos en donde el suministro de sangre es lento o limitado y apoya la recuperación, cicatrización, activación biológica de células de defensa, estabilización en la regeneración celular y tisular, teniendo uso clínico en casi todas las especialidades médicas. Esta revisión tiene como objetivo presentar las bases teóricas para la potencial aplicación del PRP y sus factores de crecimiento en tratamientos que buscan una terapia regenerativa por bioestimulación de la aplicación autóloga, en patologías para las cuales aún no existe tratamiento específico. Se revisaron artículos de los últimos 10 años en los buscadores y bases de datos Google Scholar, PubMed y Scopus y se seleccionaron aquellos que pueden ayudar a entender la aplicación de PRP en diversos procesos de regeneración, con miras a utilizarse como un tratamiento alternativo y complementario a pacientes con COVID-19. Se encontró abundante literatura experimental y clínica en el uso de PRP autóloga, en diversos procesos de regeneración, inclusive en neumología e infectología, por lo que amerita comprobar su efecto con protocolos establecidos, en patologías respiratorias severas como apoyo biológico autólogo para activar la respuesta biológica innata de tipo celular.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.