Differential productions of rural gentrification: illustrations from North and South Norfolk

Phillips, Martin

doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2004.08.001

Cited by 132 publications

(85 citation statements)

References 45 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Gentrification is a concept that is commonly used to explain the social class changes in urban areas (Smith N., 2002;Davidson & Lees, 2005). While population changes in rural areas were first defined in 1960s and 1970s as rural repopulation, rural regeneration, rural development, and rural renaissance (Phillips, 2005;Phillips, 2009), research which drew attention to the class dimension of this population change began increasing in the 1980s (Cloke & Thrift, 1987;Cloke & Thrift, 1990;Urry, 1995). Some pioneering studies (Phillips, 1993;Chaney & Sherwood, 2000;Smith & Phillips, 2001;Smith N., 2002) demonstrated that a class change and displacement process which is similar to urban areas is also experienced in rural areas.…”

Section: A Brief Discussion On Rural Gentrificationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…According to production theory state-led gentrification via planning decisions and housing policies play a significant role in both rural and urban communities. Another common feature is the active role assumed by the private sector in the gentrification process, through the activities of developers, realtors and financiers (Smith, 1979;Phillips, 2004;Phillips, 2005;Phillips, 2007;Phillips, 2009;Ghose, 2004;Darling, 2005;Chaney & Sherwood, 2000;Stockdale, 2010).…”

Section: A Brief Discussion On Rural Gentrificationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In this process (Darling, 2005), explained by Neil Smith's "rent gap" theory (1979Smith's "rent gap" theory ( , 1987, houses, local service buildings (schools, post offices, railway stations, churches) and other structures (barns, stables, cottages) are become profitable for reinvestment when the "gap" between current and potential use is reached. Upon purchase by new owners or developers, the structures are refurbished and turned into housing (Phillips, 2009;Phillips, 2005;Phillips, 2004). In fact, the gentrification process can be seen as a flow of capital rather than merely a population movement (Smith, 1979;Phillips, 2009).…”

Section: A Brief Discussion On Rural Gentrificationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The process of disinvestment that began with depopulation in the 1950s and the reinvestment process that started with the development of tourism since the 1980s created the cycle in the North Aegean countryside which was defined as "rent gap" by Smith (1979Smith ( , 1987. According to production theory (Phillips, 2004;Phillips, 2005), state led policies and planning decisions have significant role in the rural gentrification process. Tourism and conservation decisions also play an important role in the reinvestment process in the North Aegean countryside.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The change in land use, which Phillips (2005;2009) buildings, especially schools and agricultural production structures (olive oil plant, barn, sheep pen) which are common properties of the village, have changed their function. While the education buildings in Adatepe started to be used in tourism activity, the barns, sheep pens and warehouses converted into houses.…”

Section: Transformation Of Land Usementioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Rural gentrification in the North Aegean Countryside (Turkey)

Uysal

Sakarya

2018

ICONARP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article examines rural gentrification as experienced on the North Aegean coasts of Turkey. The study area chosen is the closest Aegean coast to İstanbul and it attracts attention because of its archeological and mythological values, as well as its natural beauty and vernacular landscape. The most important element determining the rural landscape of the region is olive production. The study is based principally on indepth interviews with village mukhtars, local people, newcomers, tourism entrepreneurs, and professionals.While the rural gentrification process in Turkey, a Mediterranean country, shows similarities with the gentrification process in rural areas of developed Western countries, differences can be observed as well. Depopulation in rural areas since 1950s and development of tourism in coastal areas after 1980 has brought about the investmentdisinvestment cycle, which is in the rural gentrification theory. It has been observed that in the rural area where tourism facilities have been improved, gentrification occurs in parallel. The migration of middle class to the villages has transformed the traditional land use and rural

show abstract

Section: A Brief Discussion On Rural Gentrificationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: A Brief Discussion On Rural Gentrificationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: A Brief Discussion On Rural Gentrificationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Transformation Of Land Usementioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Rural gentrification in the North Aegean Countryside (Turkey)

Uysal

Sakarya

2018

ICONARP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

New Approaches to City–Countryside Relations

2023

Development and Territorial Restructuring in an Era of Global Change

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Interpreting the Repopulation of Rural Communities: the Case of Private Neighbourhoods in Kibbutzim

Charney

Palgi

2013

Population Space and Place

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Now in the early 21st century after several decades of population shrinkage, kibbutzim are experiencing renewed growth. In-migration to kibbutzim reflects the re-appreciation of rural living, a phenomenon sought by counterurbanites and gentrifiers alike. Drawing on two regions (exurban and peripheral) in northern Israel, we examined the case of migrants to newly-built spaces in kibbutzim known as private neighborhoods. We analyse the characteristics of migrants and their motivation for migration, probing the framework of rural gentrification to study repopulation under different conditions and constraints. In accordance with the literature, migrants to kibbutzim value the well-known benefits that rural spaces have to offer but their profiles and their impact on rural communities are different than those prescribed by the literature. Acknowledging their conceptual merit, counterurbanisation and, more specifically, rural gentrification, would benefit from reflecting on the role of organizational, institutional and spatial variations in producing diverse routes for the repopulation of rural space. pursuit for greater robustness and validity of gentrification as a conceptual framework. 674I. Charney and M. Palgi

show abstract

Differential productions of rural gentrification: illustrations from North and South Norfolk

Cited by 132 publications

References 45 publications

Rural gentrification in the North Aegean Countryside (Turkey)

Rural gentrification in the North Aegean Countryside (Turkey)

New Approaches to City–Countryside Relations

Interpreting the Repopulation of Rural Communities: the Case of Private Neighbourhoods in Kibbutzim

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About