2020
DOI: 10.1364/oe.401677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential-pressure fiber-optic airflow sensor for wind tunnel testing

Abstract: A differential-pressure fiber-optic airflow (DPFA) sensor based on Fabry-Perot (FP) interferometry for wind tunnel testing is proposed and demonstrated. The DPFA sensor can be well coupled with a Pitot tube, similar to the operation of the differential diaphragm capsule in the airspeed indicator on the aircraft. For differential pressure sensing between total pressure and static pressure in the airflow, an FP cavity is formed between the sensing diaphragm and a fiber end-face, and a tubule is inserted into the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For wind tunnel airflow detection, due to the much lower temperature and pressure, silica, silicon, and even metal film-based sensors can be applicable. In 2020, Liu et al [ 77 ] proposed a differential-pressure fiber-optic airflow (DPFA) sensor, with 826.975 nm/kPa sensitivity and 0.008% (0.89 Pa) resolution under a 0~11 kPa measurable range. The sensor was tested in a wind tunnel and successfully measured the airflow velocity of 2.0~119.24 m/s with an accuracy of 0.61%, as presented in Figure 7 .…”
Section: Sensor Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For wind tunnel airflow detection, due to the much lower temperature and pressure, silica, silicon, and even metal film-based sensors can be applicable. In 2020, Liu et al [ 77 ] proposed a differential-pressure fiber-optic airflow (DPFA) sensor, with 826.975 nm/kPa sensitivity and 0.008% (0.89 Pa) resolution under a 0~11 kPa measurable range. The sensor was tested in a wind tunnel and successfully measured the airflow velocity of 2.0~119.24 m/s with an accuracy of 0.61%, as presented in Figure 7 .…”
Section: Sensor Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…u is the airflow velocity, P 0 is total pressure in the airflow, P s is static pressure in the airflow (reprinted with permission from Ref. [ 77 ] © Optical Society of America).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…C. Wang et al embedded fiberoptical anemometers based on dual F-P sensors inside a designed cubic holder by 3D printing, with a streamlined upper surface, and proved an airflow velocity measurement range from 20.39 m 3 /h to 209.03 m 3 /h [18]. Y. Liu et al proposed a differential-pressure optical-fiber anemometer based on Fabry-Perot interferometry coupled with a Pitot tube for air flow velocity measurements over a range of 737.28∼43,956.66 m 3 /h in a wind tunnel [19]. Nevertheless, the complexity of real-time liquid flow detection has not been determined, limited by sensor size in the pipeline microchannel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some recent developments on fiber-optic flow sensors have focused on the measurement of the velocity magnitude in the airflow field. Examples include fiber-optic anemometers based on dual-channel Fabry-Perot (FP) interferometers (Wang et al, 2019), as well as a single-channel differential-pressure FP sensor and a diaphragm-based sensor with built-in fiber Bragg Grating (FBGs), both coupled for use with Pitot tubes (Liu et al, 2020b;Fujiwara et al, 2020). There are also precedents expecting to combine fiber-optic pressure sensors with MHPs for future wind tunnel applications, such as multiple MEMS optical transducers (Zhou and Sheplak, 2020) and differentially dynamic FP pressure sensors (Heckmeier et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%