“…In particular, at stronger bottlenecks corresponding to inbreeding coefficients of 0.2 and 0.3, haploPS reported false-positive rates of 5.8% and 13.3%, respectively, compared with those by iHS (17.2% and 55.3%, respectively) and XP-EHH (4.4% and 8.7%, respectively). Notably, the investigation into the sharing and differentiation of positive selection signals was only made possible with the advent of haploPS, 3,14,32,33 given the higher statistical power with accompanying lower type I errors. KCNN3, PMVK, PBXIP1, PYGO2, SHC1, CKS1B, MIR4258, FLAD1, LENEP, ZBTB7B, DCST2, DCST1, ADAM15, EFNA4, EFNA3, EFNA1, SLC50A1, DPM3, KRTCAP2, TRIM46, MUC1, MIR92B, THBS3, MTX1, GBAP1, GBA, FAM189B, SCAMP3, CLK2 Our study also presented multiple lines of evidence to suggest that South Asian populations were considerably different from the rest of the Asian populations, which concurred with previous findings that South Asia is considerably more diverse than other Asian regions.…”