2003
DOI: 10.1127/0003-9136/2003/0156-0165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential physico-chemical tolerances and intraguild predation among native and invasive amphipods (Crustacea); a field study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Male E. ischnus were more predaceous at high conductivity, whereas male G. fasciatus were more predaceous at low conductivity. Other studies have similarly found that the vulnerability of an individual to predation is influenced by suboptimal abiotic conditions (Dick and Platvoet 1996;MacNeil et al 2003). However, to our knowledge, this is the first observation of a native crustacean replacing an invader as the superior predator along an environmental gradient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Male E. ischnus were more predaceous at high conductivity, whereas male G. fasciatus were more predaceous at low conductivity. Other studies have similarly found that the vulnerability of an individual to predation is influenced by suboptimal abiotic conditions (Dick and Platvoet 1996;MacNeil et al 2003). However, to our knowledge, this is the first observation of a native crustacean replacing an invader as the superior predator along an environmental gradient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…However, to our knowledge, this is the first observation of a native crustacean replacing an invader as the superior predator along an environmental gradient. In previous studies of predatory interactions between native and exotic crustaceans, the impact of the superior species on the inferior species was reduced in unfavourable abiotic conditions, but the predator-prey relationship was not reversed (Dick and Platvoet 1996;Hunt and Yamada 2003;MacNeil et al 2003;deRivera et al 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, human disturbances may prevent strong interspecific competition by native species. Competitive stress between native and invasive species is strongly influenced by local environmental circumstances, such as type of substratum, water temperature, salinity, current velocity and habitat heterogeneity (MacNeil et al 2001(MacNeil et al , 2003(MacNeil et al , 2004Wijnhoven et al 2003;Palmer and Ricciardi 2004;MacNeil and Platvoet 2005;Kestrup and Ricciardi 2009;Van Riel et al 2009). The ongoing rise in water temperature in the river Rhine due to thermal pollution and global warming will also affect the establishment success of non-indigenous species and interspecific competition (Leuven et al 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we use the term competition more broadly, defining it as a situation in which species use overlapping resources and may thus compete, regardless of differences in tactics of resource acquisition. An extreme form of encounter competition is intraguild predation (IGP), i.e., the killing and eating of species that use similar resources and are thus potential competitors (Polis et al 1989), which has frequently been observed for gammarideans (Dick 1996;Dick et al 1993;MacNeil et al 2003). IGP may affect the distribution, population size, stability and resilience of species, reduce potential competition and promote the occurrence of alternative stable states (Polis et al 1989;Dick and Platvoet 2000;Dick et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%