2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.exppara.2016.03.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential parasitological, molecular, and serological detection of Trypanosoma cruzi I, II, and IV in blood of experimentally infected mice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Diagnosis of trypanosome infection in sylvatic mammals is made mainly through hemoculture and fresh blood smears examination. Positive fresh blood smears and hemocultures display low sensitivity, but are irreplaceable tools that indicate the competence of the animal to be a source of infection for the vector (Gomes et al, 1999; Siriano et al, 2011; Teston et al, 2016; Jansen et al, 2018). The isolation and maintenance methods allow further morphological and biological studies, but exert selective pressure on the subpopulations of the parasite, favoring some and excluding others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diagnosis of trypanosome infection in sylvatic mammals is made mainly through hemoculture and fresh blood smears examination. Positive fresh blood smears and hemocultures display low sensitivity, but are irreplaceable tools that indicate the competence of the animal to be a source of infection for the vector (Gomes et al, 1999; Siriano et al, 2011; Teston et al, 2016; Jansen et al, 2018). The isolation and maintenance methods allow further morphological and biological studies, but exert selective pressure on the subpopulations of the parasite, favoring some and excluding others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The antibodies present in the sample bind to the plaque antigens and are revealed by addition of anti-immunoglobulin antibodies conjugated to an enzyme that, in contact with its substrate, donates electrons making the chromogen added change the color. The performance of the different diagnostic kits for chagasic infection has shown a sensitivity of 97.7 to 100% and specificity of 93.3 to 100% [73][74][75][76]. Moreover, it has the characteristic of being easy to manipulation and requires a small amount of sample.…”
Section: Diagnosis Of Chagas Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the existence of serological tests presenting desirable performance (high sensitivity and specificity), there is a necessity for confirmation of inconclusive results. Thus, Western blot is the technique of choice for this purpose, because PCR still requires standardized protocols and presents a sensitivity of only 80% [76,86]. TESA-blot employs excretory antigens that are secreted, originated from T. cruzi trypomastigotes of strain Y transferred to the nitrocellulose membrane, where antibodies (sample) can bind and be revealed by the addition of anti-IgG antibodies conjugated to enzyme.…”
Section: Gr Up Smmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immediately after their transmission by the insect vector (Box 1 ), parasites have to resist innate immunity and develop either intracellularly ( Leishmania and T. cruzi ) where the parasites are no longer flagellated, or extracellularly in the blood flow (bloodstream forms of T. brucei ). The diagnostic stage of the parasites relies on the presence of bloodstream forms of T. brucei gambiense , or amastigotes of Leishmania and T. cruzi in the vertebrate host ( 5 , 30 , 31 ). Parasite dissemination in their mammalian host occurs after lysis of the host cells ( Leishmania and T. cruzi ), then both intracellular amastigotes of Leishmania and bloodstream trypomastigotes of T. cruzi and T. brucei sp.…”
Section: Life Cycles: Parasites–hosts–vectors Common and Divergent Pmentioning
confidence: 99%